The following is taken from a report in the Globe and Mail called In Sweden, pension problems are so 1989 posted by Nomi Powell Posted on and a report on the Swedish Pension Plan.
Swedes contribute 18.5 per cent of their pay to the system: 16 per cent to the NDC and 2.5 per cent to a private account where money is invested in mutual funds of their choice. The public pension is a significant portion of retirement income – responsible for 75 per cent of the average monthly benefit for men at 17,000 Swedish kronor ($2,562 U.S.) and women at 12,000 kronor. The rest comes from occupational pensions negotiated between companies and unions.
In a radical change, Sweden scrapped its traditional defined benefit pension for what's called a "notional defined contribution" plan (NDC). The notional account recorded each individual's contributions and a rate of return tied to the national per capita real wage growth. There was no "real money" in the account - as in traditional pension plans, contributions fund current retiree benefits – but the system provided a way of keeping score.
Workers can retire as early as 61, but the longer they stay in the work force, the higher their benefit upon retirement. The following is a report that perhaps has some ideas for Canada
Pension Reform in Sweden: Lessons for American Policymakers By Goran Normann and Daniel Mitchell, Ph.D. published June 29,
2000
Sweden was the first nation in the world to implement a universal
government-run retirement system, but today it is in the process of privatizing
part of its pension program. Facing problems similar to those that beset the
U.S. Social Security system, the Swedes decided that personal accounts were the
best way of ensuring that today's workers would enjoy a safe and comfortable
retirement.
Sweden's former pension system was a tax-financed,
pay-as-you-go entitlement program, similar to the United States' Social Security
program. And like in the systems in the United States and other industrialized
nations, demographic and financial changes were straining Sweden's
tax-and-transfer pension programs. There were only two solutions: Raise taxes
and cut benefits to prolong solvency, or give workers private retirement
accounts.
In Sweden, policymakers decided that privatization was
the best solution. The new system has four key features:
- Transition to protect retirees and older workers. Current retirees and older workers will continue to receive retirement income based on the old program. Workers born from 1938 to 1953 will receive benefits from both the old and new systems as the new system is gradually introduced.
Swedish workers and retirees will benefit from these
reforms. The combination of partial privatization and reform of the
pay-as-you-go portion of the retirement system will result in a fiscally
sustainable system. In addition, private investments over time will allow
workers to benefit from compounding returns, which will increase retirement
income. Finally, the reform will benefit the Swedish economy. By reducing the
payroll tax rate and linking income to pension benefits, Swedish pension reform
will increase incentives to work. The shift to a funded system will also
increase national savings and provide capital for future growth.
The changes in Sweden's pension system provide important
lessons for any country facing the problems inherent in pay-as-you-go,
tax-and-transfer pension programs, including the United States. The first lesson
is that reform works. As the Swedish reforms demonstrate, countries can change
from a pay-as-you-go entitlement program to personal accounts. The second lesson
is that reform is popular. Although many consider Sweden the ultimate welfare
state, legislators from the right and left united in support of the new
privatized system. They saw that the pension program could not continue to
function as it had been. As a result, these lawmakers created a stronger
retirement system for the Swedish people.
There are many benefits to Sweden's new system, including
greater incentives to work, increased national savings, a flexible retirement
age, lower taxes and less government spending, opportunities for more reform, a
fairer system that no longer redistributes income from the poor to the rich, and
greater retirement income for retirees. The reforms in Sweden could be a model
for U.S. lawmakers as they grapple with the problem of Social Security.
In Sweden, pension reform has created a better
system--better for retirees, better for workers, and better for the economy as a
whole. The same advantages would accrue to Americans and the American
economy--but only if U.S. lawmakers learn the right lessons from what is
happening in other nations.
Göran Normann, Ph.D., President of
Normann Economics International, based in Stockholm and Paris, is an associate
professor of economics at the University of Lund, Sweden. He has worked with the
Federation of Swedish Industries and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD). Daniel J. Mitchell, Ph.D., is
McKenna Senior Fellow in Political Economy at The Heritage Foundation.
Thanks for your great information, the contents are quiet interesting.I will be waiting for your next post.
ReplyDeleteLifting Equipment Townsville