In an interesting article in the Asia Pacific Forum, Odusote Fatimah Abolanle and Alfred Muluan Wu write.
Many
governments have also introduced subsidized pensions for a specific group of
workers who registered under the pension scheme. In India, the central
government was willing to contribute 24 percent of the salary of employees
working in firms with up to 100 workers for three months.
COVID-19 has
laid bare the persistent gap in pension coverage, especially in low and
middle-income countries where the working population is mainly in the informal
sector. There is a clear need to create a non-contributory system in such a
climate, or at least to extend its coverage to cater for those in the
self-employed or informal sectors, to improve social protection and prepare
workers for retirement.
The hard truth
is social security pension systems are still mainly the business of government,
requiring strict monitoring, regulation, and support by the state, especially
in developing countries. While COVID-19 has spurred several countries to make
temporary adjustments to pension schemes, in the post-COVID-19 era all
governments will have to conduct a thorough review of their pension systems to
fix the endemic problems that exist.
In doing so,
policymakers will have to answer a number of critical questions. In addition to
benefiting from public-private partnerships, the role of the state in providing
pensions should be rethought. Policymakers should resist popular discomfort
with increasing spending on retirement income protection, and acknowledge its
many benefits for society and the economy.
While much is
up in the air for pension policy, one thing is certain. In the wake of
COVID-19’s economic shockwaves, the adequacy and sustainability of pension
schemes must be protected and extended, and policymakers must do everything
they can to make that happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment