1. When one door closes and another door opens, you are probably in prison.
I AM A SONIC BOOMER, NOT A SENIOR... In this blog, I am writing to and for those who believe that the Boomers will change what the word Senior means. I also believe that Boomers will change what retirement means in our society. The blog is also for those who are interested in what life after retirement may look like for them. In this blog, I highlight and write about issues that I believe to be important both for Seniors and working Boomers.
Tuesday, January 25, 2022
When one door closes
Monday, January 24, 2022
Picking a successor
After Quasimodo's death, the bishop of the cathedral of Notre Dame sent word through the streets of Paris that a new bell ringer was needed. The bishop decided that he would conduct the interviews personally and went up into the belfry to begin the screening process.
After observing several applicants demonstrate their skills, he decided to call it a day when a lone, armless man approached him and announced that he was there to apply for the bell ringers job. The bishop was incredulous, "You have no arms!"
"No matter," said the man, "Observe!"
He then began striking the bells with his face, producing a beautiful melody on the carillon. The bishop listened in astonishment, convinced that he had finally found a suitable replacement for Quasimodo.
Suddenly, rushing forward to strike a bell, the armless man tripped, and plunged headlong out of the belfry window to his death onto the street below.
The stunned bishop rushed to his side. When he reached the street, a crowd had gathered around the fallen figure, drawn by the beautiful music they had heard only moments before. As they silently parted to let the bishop through, one of them asked, "Bishop, who was this man?"
"I don't know his name," the bishop sadly replied, "but his face rings a bell...”
The following day, despite the sadness that weighed heavily on his heart due to the unfortunate death of the armless campanologist, the bishop continued his interviews for the bell ringer of Notre Dame.
The first man to approach him said, "Your excellency, I am the brother of the poor, armless wretch that fell to his death from this very belfry yesterday. I pray that you honour his life by allowing me to replace him in this duty."
The bishop agreed to give the man an audition, and as the armless man's brother stooped to pick up a mallet to strike the first bell, he groaned, clutched at his chest and died on the spot.
Two monks, hearing the bishop's cries of grief at this second tragedy, rushed up the stairs to his side.
"What has happened?" the first breathlessly asked, "Who is this man?" "I don't know his name," sighed the distraught bishop, "but he's a dead ringer for his brother.”
Sunday, January 23, 2022
Quality of life for seniors is missing
I am a bit upset over the issue of visit restrictions for long-term care and assisted living seniors. In November 2020, the Office of the Seniors Advocate (OSA) issued the report Staying Apart to Stay Safe: The Impact of Visit Restrictions on Long-Term Care and Assisted Living Survey, which highlighted the impact of visitor restrictions on residents and their family members. In this report, OSA identified that 52% of requests made by residents to designate an essential visitor were denied. The Seniors Advocate issued the recommendation in this report that all residents be provided with the opportunity to designate an essential visitor. However, the reality is that most are not receiving any visitors.
The Press has been, over the last few days, focussing its
attention on the issue of students going back to school and ignoring the cruel
and unusual punishment against seniors who are being held in isolation. There
is plenty of research that shows isolation is dangerous to seniors' health and
wellness, yet the problem is being ignored by the media. This is a form of
institutional ageism that exists in our country.
Current public health orders (January 2022) allow essential
visitors to continue to visit if an outbreak is declared at a facility while
social visitors’ access is suspended for the duration of the outbreak. Prior to
visiting, all visitors to the long-term care facility must be fully vaccinated and
rapid antigen tests are administered. It is now 2022 and to date, no changes
have been made to the process for determining if a resident meets the criteria
to be designated an essential visitor. The determination is made by the
administrator of the care facility on a case-by-case basis. Essentials visits
can include, but are not limited to:
•
Visits for compassionate care, including
critical illness, palliative care, hospice care, end of life, and Medical
Assistance in Dying
•
Visits paramount to the patient/client’s
physical care and mental well-being, including assistance with feeding,
mobility, and personal care
•
Communication assistance for persons with
hearing, visual, speech, cognitive, intellectual or memory impairments
•
Assistance by designated representatives for
persons with disabilities
•
Visits for supported decision making
“The Senior Advocate is receiving phone calls and emails
from family members, including spouses, who were advised they could no longer
visit their loved one, even though they offer vital support and care. They help
to feed their loved ones, get them dressed, take them for walks, and keep them
engaged. For many residents, these visitors are the only people who can
motivate them to engage in any activities, and yet they are not formally
recognized as essential,” stated Mackenzie.
The measure to protect seniors from COVID is at the expense
of a positive lifestyle and I fear for many seniors it will mean a shortened
life expectancy. It is unfair and discriminatory to say the least, and will not
change well we focus on protecting seniors with no regard for what that means
to their quality of life.
Saturday, January 22, 2022
Hidden & Invisible: Seniors Abuse in BC
We care about our seniors, or on the surface, we appear to care deeply about the older adults in our community. The depth of this commitment was on full display during the COVID-19 pandemic as we saw tens of thousands of people step forward to ensure seniors received their medications, groceries and remained connected through friendly phone calls and wellness checks. Public concern about the dignity and safety of frail seniors who live in long-term care were heard by governments at all levels and commitments to improve were quickly promised.
While we appear to care, those who track abuse and neglect
of seniors have tracked a five-year pattern of significantly increasing reports
of seniors’ abuse and neglect. In the past three to five years, according to
the senior advocate we have experienced:
•
49% increase in reports of abuse, neglect and
self-neglect to Designated Agencies
•
69% increase in reports of victims of violent
crime to the RCMP
•
87% increase in reports of physical abuse and
49% increase of financial abuse to the Vancouver Police Force
•
30% increase in reports of abuse to bc211
•
5% increase in reports to the Seniors Abuse and
Information Line
There is a concern that the reporting and tracking system in
BC is fragmented and incomplete leaving many to believe there is significant
under-reporting of abuse and neglect among older adults. Supporting this
assumption of under-reporting is the number of suspected reports of child abuse
reported each year compared to reported cases of suspected seniors’ abuse.
While both population groups are of similar size, there is an average of 60,000
such reports made for children and youth each year compared to less than 10,000
reports of suspected abuse and neglect of seniors.
In a survey, when asked if they have ever witnessed a senior
subjected to abuse and neglect, 28% of British Columbians reported they have
and although over 90% believe they would report abuse if they witnessed it,
less than half actually do. There are a number of systemic challenges in our current
adult abuse and neglect system that are limiting the potential for British
Columbians to effectively identify and report suspected abuse and neglect of
seniors.
While there are a number of resources to identify and report
seniors’ abuse and neglect, there is no cohesive provincial approach to support
the public in their desire to identify and report seniors’ abuse and neglect. A
review in 2021 by the Senior Advocate found a lack of standardization in
defining seniors’ abuse and neglect, no current plan to raise public awareness
and a fragmented reporting system that does not produce the reliable data
needed to assess patterns, identify gaps, make improvements and measure
progress. There was also clear evidence, however, that our current system can
be effective and many of the basic tenants are sound. The challenge is that the
system is not reliably effective, and many vulnerable seniors may be falling
through the cracks.
The review examined the protections that exist for BC seniors, the prevalence of seniors’ abuse and neglect, the method of reporting abuse and neglect, and the response to reports of seniors’ abuse and neglect. The report examined current legislative protections, assesses reporting practices, reviews five years of existing data, consults with 144 stakeholders in 25 communities throughout BC, and surveys over 1500 British Columbians.
The report includes five recommendations:
1.
Establish provincial standards of practice,
policies, and front-line training to respond to seniors’ abuse and neglect
2.
Create province-wide public awareness
initiatives and training on seniors’ abuse and neglect
3.
Develop a central, single point of contact to
report calls of concern of seniors’ abuse and neglect
4.
Ensure consistent data collection, methods, and
definitions to record, track and monitor abuse and neglect cases
5.
Undertake a full comprehensive review of the
Adult Guardianship Act