There is one option being pushed by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and which appears to be supported by the Financial Post. However the plan is not as good as it first appears to be and the writing of the article uses many weasel words and phrases (I have put some of them in italics) to say one thing and imply another.
The findings
of a Canadian Federation of Independent Business retirement poll of about 8,000
of its members paint a grim view of what’s on the horizon. That’s because a
majority of respondents, 58%, said they do not feel they have sufficient income
to take advantage of the various savings options available. Not surprisingly,
27%, said they planned to work to age 68 or later to be able to retire
comfortably.
The
overwhelming majority, 77%, reported they did not have a business retirement
savings plan for themselves or their employees. That’s supported by other
surveys that found 60% of Canadians have no work pension plan.
After the
global market meltdown of 2008 and the loss many investors took to their
retirement portfolios, the federal government floated a few options: increase
CPP contributions or introduce Pooled Retirement Pension Plans (PRPP). The
former option would be yet another blow to small business owners, said Dan
Kelly, president and chief executive of the CFIB.
“Increasing
CPP contributions would have a giant negative impact on employment in Canada
because an increase is a mandatory thing and you have to do it whether you can
afford it or not. It could be calamitous,”
Mr. Kelly said.
The CPP
option did not get the two-thirds consensus on the part of the provinces but there was interest in pursuing PRPPs.
Ted Menzies, Minister of State (Finance), got a clear message from business
owners. “Small business owners wanted this kind of option for some time to help
attract and retain talent. The reason they hadn’t already offered a pension
plan was because they didn’t want the
responsibility of making the investment decisions, which is the case with
group RRSPs, for example.”
Another big
barrier: affordability and accessibility. “You have to be big to offer a
full-on pension plan. If a small business
has anything for employees it is a group matched RRSP, which is what we
have here at the CFIB,” Mr. Kelly said.
“But RRSPS
are imperfect as a company offering because the management fees are
significant, ranging in the 2.5% mark, and if an employer puts money toward an
employee RRSP, the employer has to pay payroll tax on the amount of the
contribution. Depending on the industry, you
could potentially pay an extra 20% to 25% in tax to put money aside for
your employees’ retirement. It’s little wonder very few employers have jumped
into that arena.”
Mr. Kelly said PRPPs can bring the pension vehicle
down to the SMB level. Management fees are expected to be half those of group RRSPs
and the federal government has confirmed PRPPs will be exempt from payroll
taxes.
PRPPs are
administered by the private sector: financial institutions, existing pension
funds, credit unions — the options still are fairly wide open. Providers must
qualify, show a track record of investments and customer relations before they
are approved. The employer will choose from three or four products, which are still being developed. The
process is simple for the employer, Mr. Menzies said. “They choose the plan and
the administrator carries the fiduciary responsibility.”
PRPPs are
entirely voluntary. And businesses that
offer it don’t have to contribute to it. “If an employer opts in, they must offer it to all full-time employees
who will be automatically enrolled,” the minister said. “The employee has
60 days to opt out. Just write a note to the employer you choose not to take
part.”
The CFIB has
endorsed the federal legislation, but here’s the rub: Provincial governments
now have to put their own legislation in place and they can make it different.
“We hope provinces will adopt a common
framework,” said Mr. Kelly, whose organization is lobbying provincial
governments to adopt the federal plan as is.
PRPPs can
play a substantive role in retirement planning for small business owners and
their employees, Mr. Menzies said. “RRSPs
are still an option, but many people have not used it and there is a lot of
contribution room available largely by middle- and modest-income families.
Other countries have used pooled plans that have proven to be more successful.
“Some people
save in other ways and that’s fine but not for everyone. This is low cost and
the mandate is to return the best amount of money to the plan member. That will
be in the regulations,” he said.
Mr. Kelly also thinks it could be a significant savings tool with huge
uptake among entrepreneurs. “Many will view it as a great tool for themselves,
especially for the self employed who have virtually no options other than an
RRSP. For SMBs, the owner would be giving themselves a pension, too. It’s right
up there with the value of their own business as a retirement savings tool.
“When you ask
members what they have for their own retirement, it’s typically the equity in
their business. And you can’t count on
the anticipated value of your business when you are ready to retire. Look at
what happened in 2008.”
The above was from "The retirement tool SMBs have been waiting for"written by Mary Teresa Bitti on Oct 16, 2012
This is my first time viѕit at here and i am truly imprеssed
ReplyDeleteto reaԁ eveгthing аt οne place.
Here is my homepage 24optionreview.org