Back
in March, Daniella Balarezo and Daryl Chen wrote an article for ideas at TED.
The article was How to read the news like a scientist and I have highlighted
parts of it below. I recommend you read the full article.
1.
Cultivate your skepticism.
Science
moves forward by challenging accepted wisdom. You can do the same. Healthy
skepticism does not mean you’re dismissing everything as false — it simply
means remembering the things you hear could be false, but they could also be
true … or they could be something in between.”
2.
Find out who is making the claim.
When
you encounter a new claim, look for conflicts of interest. Ask: Do they stand
to profit from what they say? Are they affiliated with an organization that
could be swaying them?
3.
Watch out for the halo effect.
The
halo effect is a cognitive bias that makes our feeling towards someone affect
how we judge their claims. If we dislike someone, we are a lot more likely to
disagree with them; if we like them, we are biased to agree. Simply question
how you would consider the claim if it came from someone else.”
4.
Look at the evidence.
When
evaluating a claim, Frans asks, “Can the sources be traced? Are they reliable?
Is the conclusion based on a rational evaluation of the information?” And you
should try to consider all of the research on a topic. Before you act on or
share a particularly surprising or enraging story, do a quick Google search —
you might learn something even more interesting.
5.
Beware of the tendency to cherry-pick information.
Another
human bias — confirmation bias — means we’re more likely to notice stories or
facts that fit what we already believe (or want to believe). In your own life,
look for friends and acquaintances on social media with alternative viewpoints.
You don’t have to agree with them, or tolerate misinformation from them — but
it’s healthy and balanced to have some variety in your information diet.
6.
Recognize the difference between correlation and causation.
Correlation
does not equal causality. Keep this in mind when thinking about our world. For
example, if there is a rise in violent crime in your area and it’s being blamed
on gang activity, or if a politician is credited with creating a low
unemployment rate, take a wider view and look into the other contributing
factors. It’s important to remember that there might be alternative
explanations for a phenomenon.
No comments:
Post a Comment