Social isolation in
childhood and in late adulthood both have an impact on neurobiological
architecture and functional organization. The ensuing loss of social and cognitive
capacity has significant public health consequences. On the individual scale,
this can result in people becoming less socially engaged and, hence, at greater
risk of developing antisocial behaviour. The result is likely to be a drain on
the public purse, either in terms of caring for individuals in psychological
and physical decline or of the incarceration of disorderly individuals. If
social isolation during development happens on a sufficiently large scale, it is
likely to have significant consequences for community stability and social
cohesion.
These prospects should
encourage us to search for means to mitigate possible negative backlash. Social
isolation at a massive scale risks creating cohorts of individuals who are less
socially functional. It may, therefore, be important to identify ways of
mitigating the worst of the effects to alleviate the consequences. The
following possible countermeasures may be worth exploring.
One promising intervention
would involve creating opportunities where mutual social support relationships
(friendships) can develop naturally. One cannot, however, force people to
become friends: both parties need to be willing to devote resources to each
other in a context where the time budget available for social engagement is
limited and there are competing
friendship interests. However, by providing more opportunities for people to
meet in congenial environments, new friendships may blossom.
Social neuroscientists undertook
a longitudinal intervention study of 332 matched adults who underwent regular
training sessions. Several months of cognitive training improved empathy for
others’ affective state or perspective-taking of others’ mental state, which
resulted in structural remodeling in brain regions belonging to the social
brain network, including the frontoinsular network and the default mode
network. Daily affective training resulted in thickening of the right anterior
and mid-insula, with correspondingly enhanced compassion ratings. Different
training regimes correlated with different brain regions.
One important lesson is
that joining clubs can have important benefits in reducing both a sense of
loneliness and psycho- logical or psychiatric conditions. One obvious solution
is to encourage vulnerable individuals to join social groups and communities
that suit their interests and abilities. Establishing a wide range of such
clubs is likely to be much cheaper than paying for care homes and prisons.
Singing is known to have a
dramatic, immediate effect on creating a sense of social engagement and
elevating psychological well-being (the 'ice-breaker effect'. Vulnerable
individuals could be encouraged to join choirs and community singing groups.
Encouragement and funding may need to be invested in establishing a network of
choirs.
Use of video-embedded
digital communication is likely to gain in importance. This is especially true
where family and friendship groups can meet in the same virtual space. The
visual component of the interpersonal encounter appears to play a key role in
creating a more satisfying experience of digital social media.
The report ends with two
interesting questions:
1. Across the entire lifespan, to what extent does
reduced social stimulation or too few social contacts diminish the general
capacities of the cognitive range?
2. How much do people struggling with cognitive load have
issues maintaining many active social relationships? New insight in this chicken-and-egg problem
will shed light on the cause of loneliness and may usher in new intervention
strategies
No comments:
Post a Comment