Wednesday, March 13, 2013

More women working into retirement years

There is a growing number of retirement-age women who are still in the work force, according to recent census figures. One of the most surprising recent U.S. economic trends: the increasing presence of women working well beyond traditional retirement age, into their late sixties, seventies and beyond.  This will be the fastest-growing workforce segment in the next five years, according to the US Department of Labor.

The number of working women over age 65 rose 147 percent from 1977 to 2007; those over 75 rose 172 percent, according to the department's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Over the next five years, the number of older women in the workforce will grow at a rate faster than younger women and almost double that of older men, the bureau said.

The biggest jump in working women of retirement age was among those 65-69, whose numbers increased from 19.9 percent to 26.4 percent nationwide between 2000 and 2010.

In Central Florida, the percentage of working women 65-69 rose from 18.8 percent to 26 percent, while men of the same age who were still working declined from 29.2 percent to 22.4 percent
What worries many of them most is unemployment. The fear is if they were  fired or left their jobs who would hire a person who is over 70?
The census figures indicate that the Great Recession has forced more women to postpone retirement, said professor Stephen Golant, a University of Florida gerontologist.
"It suggests to me they are delaying retirement," Golant said. "That means to me they need more income because their personal wealth declined."
In the state of Florida, 10.8 percent of women 65 and older were working in 2011 — and nearly 40 percent of those were employed full time, according to the census. Nationwide, 12.7 percent of retirement-age women were still in the work force, with 38.2 percent of them working full-time jobs.
For those younger retirement-age working women, this trend may be the harbinger of things to come. Within the age group, 70-74, the percentage went up from 9.9 percent to 10.5 percent in Central Florida

Some growth can be attributed to economic travails, but many women say they are making up for lost time after raising children or being shut out of male-dominated jobs in their younger working days. Others can't imagine turning their backs on hard-won career gains.

Rising longevity and the aging baby boom partially explain the trend. Almost 75 percent of 55- to 64-year-olds will be working in 2018, compared with 65 percent in 2008, forecasts Northeastern University economist Barry Bluestone. Likewise, he thinks 30 percent of Americans age 65 to 74 will be working at that point, up from 25 percent in 2008.

Some researchers believe something else is at play. Elizabeth Fideler, a research fellow at the Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College and the author of "Women Still at Work: Professionals Over Sixty and On the Job," has studied the cohort, and she believes they are making up for slow career starts.

"Many of them faced sex discrimination," she says. These women entered adulthood in the late 1950s and early 1960s, before the women's movement began, when the career choices they faced were narrow and help-wanted ads were segregated by sex.

At that time, most working women were funneled into nursing, teaching, secretarial or social work. Eventually, many switched to other careers. These were hard-won gains.

"They're damned if they're going to give it up now," says Fideler. "They've reached the peak of their careers and don't want to stop, even if their husbands have retired."

BLOOMING LATE

Ann Kaganoff, 76, is late bloomer. The Irvine, California, resident began her career as a grade-school teacher. She entered a doctoral program at the University of California at Santa Barbara in reading and language development at age 36.

"My dad said I needed to be a teacher so that I'd always be able to provide for myself," she says. "But in graduate school, I discovered I was a good analytical thinker, and that was exciting."

Kaganoff's career didn't really start taking off until 1985, when at age 50 she started and ran a clinic for children with reading and learning problems at the University of California at Irvine.

"I was learning new things constantly," she says.

In 1992 the clinic closed, a victim of budget cuts at the university. Today, Kaganoff feels that she's at the peak of her professional growth with a private therapy practice in Irvine, and she doesn't see herself stepping away anytime soon.

"The experiences are so cumulative," she says. "Every time I walk into a meeting, I realize the wealth of background I have to draw upon."

Fideler fits the profile. She's 70 and already at work on a follow-up book on the second-fastest-growing age group in the labor force: men over age 65.

Older men keep working for the same career achievement and income rewards that motivate women. But perhaps Fideler will find that men simply grow tired of watching their wives leave for work every morning, and of spending the day by themselves.

Source here. (Editing by Linda Stern, Chelsea Emery and Douglas Royalty)

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

How to avoid wrecking your retirement

This is  a review of the book 52 ways to wreck your retirement and how to rescue it. The review was published in the  Herald Business on February 8, 2013 - and written BY KAYE PARKER

It isn’t easy to find a book that gives us a Canadian perspective on retirement, or on anything financial in nature, so I found this first book by Tina Di Vito quite useful.

Out of the 52 mistakes she says we make around retirement, I figure I’ve made about 21 of them. So while her topics and advice may seem simplistic to those who cut their teeth on a math book, the rest of us will find her easy manner, plain language and down-to-earth style quite appealing.

The truth is, some of us really don’t want to think about retirement at all. In fact, one of the problems with retirement is that word retirement itself. It sounds old, useless and tired, and that doesn’t conjure up a particularly appealing visual.

Yet in reality, not all of us will want to work forever and we should start planning for our retirement long before we are ready to really think about it.

De Vito has spent more than 20 years of her life as head of the BMO Retirement Institute, so she has seen her fair share of mistakes people like you and me have made over the years.

She devotes one short chapter to each of the 52 ways we can wreck our retirement, and ends each chapter with three or four actions we can take to salvage that mistake.

52 Ways to Wreck Your Retirement is divided into 11 sections, each covering one aspect of retirement. They include how to plan for retirement — sooner rather than later — and the mistakes we make when it comes to investing, incurring debt and paying it off.

The author talks about ways to save for retirement, about pensions, and what we can do to minimize taxes. She also talks about living and spending in that last third of our life, how our retirement will be different from that of our parents, and the different ways we can protect ourselves during retirement.

She also suggests having conversations with our families about what they may or may not inherit, and asking for help with some of the more complex issues of retirement planning.

Some examples of typical retirement planning mistakes include:

•Taking too long to pay off the mortgage;

•Over or underestimating your Old Age Security and Canada Pension Plan benefits;

•Pinning your hopes on the company pension plan;

•Not knowing all your choices with your Defined Benefit Plan when you do retire;

•Waiting too long to downsize your home;

•Not recognizing that you could be single in retirement;

•Spending too much too soon after you retire.

And know your net worth. Pay attention to bank statements and paycheque information to be sure it is correct. Review your investments and your beneficiaries at least once every five years. Pay off your mortgage, and don’t spend too much on your kids.

Figuring out how much money we need for our retirement is difficult. We don’t know how long we will live or how healthy we will be. We do know, however, that we are living much longer than our parents did.

Many financial planners are using 100 as their target age when they help people plan their retirement. Most of us figure we won’t live that long, but Di Vito points out that there were 6,530 centenarians in Canada as of July 2010. It is also important to note that 5,196 of them were women.

It’s no surprise that women outlive men. Unfortunately, while salaries for women are catching up with those of their male counterparts, they still, on average, earn less.

Women are still more apt to work part time or take time off to raise a family, or look after aging parents. This makes women very vulnerable when it comes to retirement. They often have less access to pension plans and lower retirement savings, so if their husband didn’t provide for them, they could face a bleak future.

Women are often good at day-to-day budgeting but woefully lacking in investment knowledge. Many women and yes, men too, believe it’s just too complicated. In that case get a financial planner to help you.

If you are a novice at investing and planning for your future, ask for help. Pick someone you trust and with whom you feel comfortable. This isn’t the time to be a DIY when you are making plans for 30 or more years of your life.

This book doesn’t need to be read cover to cover. Find those areas that apply to you or interest you and dig in. It’s a good retirement primer.


Reviewed by Kaye Parker. Kaye’s personal website is www.kayeparker.ca. Follow her on twitter at http://twitter.com/ThinkKayeParker. Her email address is Kaye@thinktraining.ca.

Monday, March 11, 2013

Our government is using DoubleSpeak

George Orwell said  “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental , nor do they result from from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink” 

According to Orwell “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”  I for one do not believe that Steven believes what he said, but he sure he believes the whole aim [of his comments]is "to narrow the language of thought “

The following was published by Canadian Press on February 9th, 2013 and I suspect a lot of people missed the story. George Orwell in his novel 1984 had some thoughts about what Harper is doing.

Steven Harper used doublethink and the Mainstream media press did not challenge him, see if you can spot the the doublethink in this story. 

 I also believe that he and his party believe  that "if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.” 

 Prime Minister Stephen Harper says the closure of a Vancouver coast guard station is in keeping with his government's emphasis on public safety.

The shuttering of the Kitsilano base announced last year has prompted demands from Premier Christy Clark and Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson for the government to change its mind, saying the move puts lives at risk.

But Harper said Friday his government is allocating its resources in a way that is best for the public.
"The paramouncy of government resources in this area is on public safety and the government is allocating its resources in a way that we believe, based on the advice we have received from the coast guard, that is best in terms of public safety," the prime minister said.

"That is to put as many of the resources as we can into actually having rescue boats in the water. That's where we put our investments going forward."

The Kitsilano base is in the heart of Vancouver's waterfront and is considered the busiest base in Canada, responding to more than 350 calls per year.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

An easy way to cut food intake


One way to cut down on the consumption of food is to use a smaller plate. Many of us in North America should consider switching to the European plate size as it would help us control our eating. Image is from  The Urban Farm and Garden page on Facebook