10 Tips to Combat Ageism Within an Organization

Nearly 60 years after workplace age discrimination was outlawed, two out of three workers aged 45 to 74 say they have experienced age discrimination at work, according to AARP. A study published in JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association) found more than 90% of people between 50 and 80 experienced some level of ageism in their lives.

Discovering and addressing our internal biases and stereotypes is crucial. Ageism in the workplace is prevalent, but the good news is that awareness empowers us. Recognizing ageism in the workplace is just the beginning. Taking proactive steps to prevent it is key.

Raise Awareness

Foster a culture where individuals are mindful of ageist behaviors. Offer training sessions to educate employees on ageism and how to identify it. Schedule quarterly workshops where employees can learn about ageism through interactive activities, guest speakers, and group discussions.

Review HR Processes

Assess your hiring procedures to ensure age bias is not infiltrating your organization. Identify areas where improvements can be made. Conduct blind resume reviews where age-related information is removed to focus on candidates' skills and experiences.

Encourage open communication.

Create a safe and confidential reporting system for employees to share their experiences of ageism. This can be done through an anonymous reporting platform or a designated HR representative. For example, the organization can have a "Speak Up" hotline where employees can report any incidents of ageism.

Celebrate age diversity,

Organize events and activities that celebrate the diversity of ages within the organization. This can include intergenerational mentorship programs, age-themed celebrations, or even a "Wisdom Exchange" program where older employees share their expertise with younger colleagues.

Educate Managers

Managers play a vital role in leading by example. Equip them with the knowledge and skills to recognize and address ageist behaviors within their teams. Implement mandatory manager training sessions on diversity and inclusion, specifically focusing on age-related issues and how to support an age-diverse team.

Embrace Reverse Mentoring

Launch a reverse mentorship program to create a mutually beneficial learning experience between older and younger employees. Encourage them to learn from each other and challenge age biases. Pair senior employees with younger employees to share their expertise in areas like leadership and industry knowledge, while younger employees can provide insights into new technologies and social media trends.

Establish a Go-To Person

Clearly communicate to all employees who they can approach if they encounter ageism and are uncomfortable discussing it with their immediate manager. Designate a diversity and inclusion officer who is trained to handle ageism complaints and promote a safe and confidential reporting process.

Implement Flexible Work Arrangements

Offer flexible work options to accommodate the diverse needs of older employees, such as part-time roles, job-sharing, or remote work opportunities. Create a policy that allows employees to request flexible working arrangements and ensure that requests are fairly assessed based on business needs and employee circumstances.

Highlight Success Stories

Celebrate and promote the achievements of older employees within the organization to showcase their value and counteract ageist stereotypes. Feature success stories of older employees in company newsletters, on the intranet, and during team meetings to highlight their contributions and inspire others.

Promote Lifelong Learning

Encourage continuous learning and development for employees of all ages by providing access to training programs, workshops, and educational resources. Offer professional development stipends or access to online courses for all employees, emphasizing that learning and growth are continuous processes that benefit everyone.

Create Age-Inclusive Policies

Develop and enforce policies that explicitly prohibit age discrimination and promote age diversity within the workplace. Revise the company's code of conduct to include clear guidelines against age discrimination and ensure that all employees are aware of these policies through regular communication and training.

Foster Intergenerational Collaboration

Encourage projects and initiatives that bring together employees from different age groups to work collaboratively, leveraging their diverse perspectives and skills. Organize cross-generational teams for strategic projects or problem-solving workshops, ensuring a mix of ages and experiences to promote innovation and inclusivity.

Monitor and track progress.

Regularly monitor and track the organization's progress in reducing ageism. This can be done through surveys, focus groups, or anonymous feedback mechanisms. The organization can also set goals and metrics to measure the success of its ageism-reduction initiatives. For example, the organization can conduct an annual survey to gauge employee perceptions of ageism and track changes over time.

By implementing these additional strategies, organizations can create a more inclusive and supportive environment that values employees of all ages, ultimately helping to reduce and eliminate ageism in the workplace.

Creating an Age-Inclusive Society

To combat ageism and promote an age-inclusive society, it is essential to challenge stereotypes and raise awareness about the valuable contributions of seniors. Fostering intergenerational relationships and encouraging advocacy and empowerment initiatives can also help break down age-related barriers. Furthermore, implementing age-friendly policies and legislation that protect the rights and well-being of older adults is crucial in creating a society that values and respects individuals of all ages.

Many countries have laws in place that aim to protect against age discrimination in various settings, such as employment, housing, and public services. These laws prohibit unfair treatment based on age and provide avenues for legal recourse for those who experience ageism. It's essential to know your rights and understand the protections available to you or your loved ones.

In recent years, there has been a growing movement towards age-friendly policies that prioritize the needs and well-being of older adults. These policies aim to create environments that promote active aging, social participation, and inclusion. Examples include age-friendly cities and communities, accessible public transportation, and age-inclusive healthcare services. By implementing such policies, societies can work towards becoming more inclusive and supportive of their aging populations.

While legislation and policies are important steps toward combating ageism, it's necessary to evaluate their effectiveness. Regular assessments and reviews can help identify gaps or areas for improvement in existing legal measures. By continually refining and updating these laws, we can ensure that they remain relevant and effective in addressing ageism and protecting the rights of seniors.

In conclusion, ageism has far-reaching consequences for seniors, impacting their health, well-being, and overall quality of life. It's up to all of us to challenge these prejudices and foster a more age-inclusive society. By raising awareness, promoting intergenerational relationships, and advocating for policy changes, we can dismantle ageist barriers and create a world where people of all ages are valued and respected. Remember, we're never too old to make a difference!

It is our collective responsibility to combat ageism and create a future that embraces the wisdom, experience, and contributions of older adults. Together, let us strive to ensure that every individual, regardless of age, is treated with dignity, respect, and fairness.

 

Should We Reframe How We Talk About Aging?

In an earlier post, I suggested that ageism is a problem because the research on the subject is inconclusive. One way to bring more awareness to the issue is to improve the public’s understanding of aging. Reframing Aging, a United States research group in its research found that there are stark differences between what professionals in the field of aging believe about older people and the process of aging and what the public believes. We need to find better ways to talk about aging so that the public learns the whole story about aging, not just the incomplete version that focuses on dependence and disability. Some of these gaps include:

Key Drivers of Aging Outcomes

While professionals working in the field of aging recognize the role of contextual, social, and systemic factors in shaping the process and experience of aging, the public sees individuals and their will and personal decisions as determining the shape and outcomes of the life course. 

Attitude Toward Aging

Professionals working in the field of aging believe that aging brings new opportunities and capacities for growth, contribution, and self-expression, while the public sees few positive aspects of aging and views age as an opponent to fight.

Outcomes of Increased Longevity

Advocates and professionals in the field of aging recognize that increased longevity brings both challenges and opportunities. It may mean more years living on a fixed income, living with chronic conditions that require treatment and support, and living beyond our ability to drive our own cars. At the same time, it may mean more opportunities to contribute to families and communities and experience new things for the first time. We know that there are many ways to meet these challenges and maximize these opportunities through programs, policies, education, and new attitudes. The public, on the other hand, sees only the challenges and is not confident that much can be done to ensure well-being in older age.

Policy Solutions

While professionals working in the field of aging explain that successful adaptation to an aging society requires adjustments across the full spectrum of our national infrastructure, the public has largely not considered public policy as a solution.

Ageism

Professionals working in the field of aging are attuned to the myriad ways that older people face discrimination in our society, however, the public is largely not aware of ageism or the need to address it.

To address the lack of knowledge about ageism and its impacts, advocates need to define ageism, explain the problem and its consequences, and suggest systemic solutions in messages about ageism.

Thoughts on Ageism

Ageism, a form of discrimination based on age, is a pervasive issue that affects individuals in numerous aspects of their lives. Ageism encompasses various forms of prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination that target older adults, leading to detrimental consequences for their psychological well-being, social inclusion, and economic stability.

Ageism has been around longer than the debate of pineapple on pizza. Throughout history, societies have often valued youth and beauty while disregarding the wisdom and experience that comes with age. From limiting employment opportunities to shaping societal norms, ageism has embedded itself deep within our cultural framework.

Ageism is like that annoying relative who thinks they know everything about you based on one family gathering. Older adults are often subjected to stereotypes like being technologically inept, forgetful, or even resistant to change. It's as if the moment you hit a certain age, people assume you can no longer grasp the intricacies of modern life. But hey, what do they know? They're probably still using flip phones.

Institutional ageism is like that annoying automated voice you encounter when trying to reach customer service—impersonal, frustrating, and just plain unfair. This type of ageism is embedded in policies, practices, and systems that limit access to resources and services for older individuals. From healthcare to finance, institutional ageism can make navigating the world a whole lot more challenging for seniors.

Discrimination against seniors can be as subtle as a backhanded compliment or as blatant as denying them opportunities solely based on their age. Society often forgets to include older adults in important conversations and decision-making processes. It's like they think they're outdated and have nothing valuable to contribute. Newsflash: we are the original influencers, and our wisdom is priceless.

Ageism can do a number on an individual's self-esteem. Constantly being bombarded with messages that depreciate our value based on age can make some older adults question their worth and identity. It's like society expects us to stop growing and contributing just because we've celebrated a few more birthdays. But guess what? We are still rocking our  leather jackets and dancing like nobody's watching.

Promoting Positive Ageing

Embracing a positive mindset towards aging is a key strategy to enhance subjective age. By challenging negative beliefs about getting older, we can reshape our perspective and adopt a more optimistic view. Engage in activities that promote personal growth, celebrate achievements, and maintain a sense of purpose. Surround yourself with positive role models who embody active and fulfilling lives at any age. Remember, age is just a number, and it doesn't define our potential for happiness and fulfillment.

To combat ageism, we need to start by raising awareness and challenging the stereotypes that perpetuate it. We can all play a part by speaking out against ageist language and jokes, and by promoting positive images and stories of older adults. Let's celebrate the wisdom, experience, and contributions that come with age, rather than reducing someone's worth to a number.

Building strong connections between different generations is another powerful way to combat ageism. By fostering intergenerational relationships, we can break down barriers and bridge the gap between young and old. Whether it's through volunteering, mentorship programs, or community initiatives, these connections help challenge ageist assumptions and promote understanding and empathy across all age groups.

In addition to mindset, certain lifestyle factors can contribute to how young or old we feel. Taking care of our physical health through regular exercise, a balanced diet, and proper sleep can have a positive impact on our subjective age. Engaging in meaningful social connections and maintaining an active social life can also promote feelings of youthfulness and belonging. Finding purpose and meaning in our daily lives, whether through work, hobbies, or volunteering, can provide a sense of fulfillment and vitality at any age.

Advocacy and empowerment initiatives are crucial in the fight against ageism. By joining forces with organizations and activists working to combat age-based discrimination, we can amplify our voices and push for change. Together, we can advocate for policies and programs that promote inclusivity, equal rights, and opportunities for people of all ages. Remember, age is just a number, not a measure of a person's worth

Chronological vs Subjective ageind Examining Stereotypes and Prejudice

Ageism, much like the high-waisted jeans trend, is a concept that has unfortunately stood the test of time. It refers to prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination against individuals based on their age, particularly when it pertains to older adults. You know, like assuming they can't work their smartphone and offering to show them how to send a text like it's a mystical art form.

Unfortunately, ageism is still prevalent in society, and it affects individuals of all ages. Ageism refers to stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination based on age. Older adults often face negative stereotypes, such as being viewed as frail, technologically inept, or mentally unstable. These stereotypes can lead to exclusion, limited opportunities, and unequal treatment. Conversely, younger individuals may also experience ageism, with their abilities and perspectives being disregarded due to their perceived lack of life experience.

The impact of ageism on mental health should not be underestimated. Feeling marginalized and overlooked can lead to increased rates of depression, anxiety, and even cognitive decline. It's like society is saying, "Hey, you're old, so you might as well just sit in a rocking chair and count down your days." But seniors are resilient, and they deserve better than society's ageist assumption

Interestingly, subjective age plays a role in the experience of ageism. Individuals who feel younger than their chronological age may be more resilient to age-related stereotypes and discrimination. They are less likely to conform to societal expectations and are more likely to challenge ageist attitudes. On the other hand, those who feel older than their age may internalize negative age-related beliefs, leading to reduced self-confidence and a greater susceptibility to ageist treatment. Recognizing the impact of subjective age in the context of ageism is essential for fostering a more inclusive and age-diverse society.

It is possible to change our subjective age. Although subjective age is influenced by a variety of factors, including genetic predispositions and societal norms, research suggests that interventions and lifestyle modifications can impact how we perceive our age. By adopting a healthy lifestyle, engaging in activities that promote a sense of purpose and fulfillment, and cultivating a positive mindset towards aging, individuals can experience a shift in their subjective age and embrace a more positive and youthful outlook on life.

 

Subjective vs Chronological Age 1

Do you feel as old as you are, and if so, what does this mean to your ability to enjoy growing older. Subjective vs Chronological age are distinct concepts and can have different impacts on various aspects of the well-being and health of those of us who are older.

I don’t think about my age and have not done so, since I turned legal drinking age about 56 years ago. I know that there were milestones celebrated with friends and family, (turning 40, turning 50, becoming 65, etc.) but I did not think about what being those ages meant. Nor do I think about what being my age today means. I think about what I can and cannot do, rather than what I can or cannot do because of my age. Subjective age refers to how individuals perceive and experience their own age, which may or may not align with their chronological age. I have read that some people may feel younger or older than their actual age, and this perception can influence their attitudes, behaviours, and overall well-being. Since I don’t know how one should feel at a particular age, this fascinates me.

Research has shown that younger subjective age is associated with various positive outcomes, including better cognitive functioning, higher levels of physical activity, improved mental health, and a reduced risk of mortality. Older adults who feel younger tend to engage in more adaptive health behaviours and report higher life satisfaction.

Aging is a complex process, and our perception of age plays a significant role in how we experience it. Subjective age and chronological age are two key concepts that shape our understanding of aging.

Chronological age is the most straightforward concept—it's simply the number of years we have been alive since birth. It is the most commonly used method to determine age and is often used in legal, medical, and social contexts. Chronological age is fixed and does not change, unlike subjective age which can fluctuate based on individual experiences and perceptions. It serves as an objective measurement of our age and is widely used in legal, medical, and social contexts. However, as we'll discover, it doesn't tell the whole story of how we feel or experience aging.

Subjective age, on the other hand, is more about how old or young we perceive ourselves to be. It's a subjective experience that considers personal beliefs, attitudes, and various factors that influence our feelings and behaviors. It is important to understand that subjective perceptions can vary greatly from person to person. Some individuals may feel younger than their chronological age, while others may feel older. It's important to note that subjective age may not necessarily correspond to physical or biological markers of aging. This means that two individuals of the same chronological age may have completely different subjective ages based on their unique perspectives and experiences.

Subjective age and chronological age are two distinct concepts that shape our perception and experience of aging. While chronological age refers to the number of years, we have been alive, subjective age relates to how old or young we feel and perceive ourselves to be.

By understanding the interplay between these two dimensions, we can gain insights into the complexity of aging and its impact on various aspects of our lives.

A walk down memory lane with a purpose

 We need to find ways to make our voices heard, here are some more ideas.

Stay informed about proposed legislation related to senior rights and ageism. Support bills and initiatives that aim to address these issues and urge your elected officials to support them as well. Share information about relevant legislation with your networks to raise awareness and build broader support. Pick up the phone and write to your mayors, MLAs, and MPs. Let them know about the challenges we face in our communities and the support we require. In the community I live, the number of individuals over 50 accounts for 38% of the population, with 16% being over 65. Shockingly, there are 40,000 seniors over 65, outnumbering the 32,000 students attending school. We can be ignored only if our politicians don’t want to be re-elected.

Engage with younger generations to foster understanding and solidarity. Encourage open discussions about ageism, its impact on seniors, and the importance of respecting and valuing older adults. By promoting intergenerational dialogue, we can challenge stereotypes and work towards a more inclusive society.

Seniors over 65 in BC who are not in long-term care or assisted living are required to pay for the NACI-recommended Fluzone High Dose Influenza Vaccine, costing approximately $75 to $90. Meanwhile, provinces like Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Yukon Territory provide this vaccine for free. The federal government covers the cost for those in long-term care and assisted living. Why are seniors in BC not receiving the recommended Fluzone High Dose Influenza Vaccine? Instead, they are offered a trivalent Fluad vaccine not recommended by NACI. We must prioritize the health of seniors, keeping them out of hospitals by taking proactive measures.

The high cost of vaccines poses another challenge. Many vulnerable seniors cannot afford the Shingles vaccine (priced at $300) or the Pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar 20 (costing approximately $150) to prevent pneumonia. Given that 74% of seniors already have pre-existing chronic conditions that lower their immunity, preventive action by the Ministry of Health would significantly reduce hospital admissions.

Remember when we discussed getting "badass" again? Well, now is the time to act. Reach out to your MLAs and contact your mayors, expressing your concerns and needs. Use this link to identify your MLA: ((leg.bc.ca)). If we don't raise our voices and address our concerns, no one else will. An election is approaching in BC, scheduled on or before October 19, 2024. Parties and candidates will be formulating their platforms and seeking our votes. As seniors, we possess the power to drive change. This is our call to action!

Consider utilizing media platforms to share your perspectives and advocate against ageism. Write op-eds, create blog posts, or contribute articles to local newspapers or online publications. Use storytelling as a powerful tool to raise awareness and challenge negative narratives surrounding aging.

By taking these actions, seniors can make a significant impact in raising awareness about ageism, improving their treatment during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and influencing policy decisions. Together, we can work towards a society that values and respects people of all ages, ensuring that seniors receive the support and dignity they deserve.

Let's make a difference and demand the attention, support, and resources we deserve. Together, we can create a better future for all seniors in our communities.

Ah, ageism, the fine art of stereotyping

 Ah, ageism, the fine art of stereotyping an entire group of people because, well, who needs individuality when you can make sweeping generalizations? Lately, the media has been having a field day discussing how affluent seniors have become. Some in the media have even dubbed us "Old. Rich. Spoiled." Quite the compliment, I must say.

Let's take a moment to appreciate the riveting statistics Canada has to offer. According to Stats Canada, in 2020, the total median income of Canadian senior citizens aged 65 years and over amounted to $32,020 Canadian dollars. and 25% of seniors earn an income of less than $21,000. Hold on to your pearls, because 50% of Canadian seniors are living on less than that, with the majority of them braving the solitude of living alone. Meanwhile, those youthful whippersnappers are enjoying a median income of, $51,170 for the prime working-age population, often in the luxurious embrace of a two-person household, where costs are conveniently split. How utterly unfair!

Now, don't you dare forget about the impoverished souls in British Columbia. Our Senior Advocate, claims that over 52,000 seniors in that province are barely surviving on a measly $16,300 per year. How they manage to scrape by is truly a mystery. Sure, some may argue that low-income seniors live in homes without mortgages, but let's not overlook those property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs that just love to devour their fixed income. And let's not forget the joy of being a part of the 20% of senior households that are rented, facing annual increases on their stagnant income. It's a real party.

But wait, there's more! Seniors also get to revel in the delightful realm of healthcare costs. Need drugs? Mobility aids? Dental care? Eyeglasses or hearing aids? Well, tough luck, my friend. Seniors bear the full brunt of those expenses, with no workplace benefits to soften the blow.

Sure, seniors might have some wealth squirrelled away, but let's not forget they're required to actually generate an income from it. Unlike those lucky ducks who receive their income from employment and can watch their wealth compound effortlessly. Life just isn't fair, is it?

But hey, it's not all doom and gloom. Seniors also happen to make some pretty impressive contributions to society. They volunteer like there's no tomorrow, bless their generous souls. And let's not forget the millions of hours of care they provide to their spouses and sometimes even their parents. Can you imagine the horror if they didn't step up? The cost to the government would be downright staggering! In fact, unpaid caregivers over 65 save the Canadian healthcare system an estimated four billion dollars. Cha-ching!

And guess what? Seniors don't just stop at unpaid labour, they're also quite generous with their wallets. In B.C., seniors are oh-so-kindly required to part with 80% of their income for the privilege of residential care, up to a maximum of $3092.66. But that's not all! They also graciously offer up 70% of their income for government-subsidized assisted living, with the maximum amount varying based on local market conditions. And as if that weren't enough, they even get to co-pay the costs of their home support on a sliding scale, all based on their income. Isn't that just delightful?

So, you see, dear friends, seniors are a truly unique bunch. Some have money, some don't. Some are in good health, while others aren't so fortunate. Some give back to their communities, while others... well, let's just say they're not as dedicated. But what matters most is that we value their uniqueness, just like we do with those not yet burdened by the grand old age of 65. Let's make sure no one gets left behind and create a society that embraces one and all. Cheers to that!

Official Launch of the Canadian Coalition Against Ageism

The official launch of the newly-formed Canadian Coalition Against Ageism took place in Toronto in late November. The BC Seniors Advocate is one of the founding members of the Coalition, along with other organizations and experts that are committed to ending ageism. Organizations supporting the initiative include ILC Canada, CNPEA, Help Age Canada, CanAge, the International Federation on Ageing, RTOERO, and the National Pensioners Federation.

The coalition’s goal is to combat ageism, focus on strengthening, protecting and promoting the human rights of older adults and “encourage the Canadian government and the United Nations to support recommendations from the World Health Organization’s Global Report on Ageism”. The event was also an opportunity to connect with the senior's advocates in Newfoundland and New Brunswick to discuss common issues impacting older Canadians.

To read the UN Global Report on Ageism, visit: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016866

Promoting the labour force participation Of older Canadians

In 2018 the government published a report on labour force participation of older Canadians. It was relatively upbeat, and it saw a world where there would not be widespread labour shortages over the next 5 to ten years. Then the Pandemic hit in 2020 and we are still feeling the impacts. The workers had the opportunity to reassess how they feel about work and there was a paradigm shift in attitudes toward work. We hear talk of the quiet resignation or the refusal of workers to go back to the office or the mass resignation.

Because of all of these factors and an ageing population, skill shortages are expected to increase in certain occupations, sectors and regions. Consequently, industry and the government believe there is a need to increase the labour force participation of older individuals, and of other groups of Canadians, to support businesses, economic growth and continued improvement in Canada’s standard of living.

According to the report issued in 2017 overall, older Canadians fare relatively well in the labour market, with record-high labour force participation rates and a clear upward trend in retirement ages. However, there is still room for improvement, as Canada’s participation rate of older individuals lags behind other countries. There are also many older adults who struggle when trying to stay in the labour market or re-enter the workforce because they face particular challenges, including:

·        ageism;

·        lack of education and access to training;

·        difficulty in finding and applying for jobs;

·        health issues, work-life balance issues and lack of workplace          accommodations; and

·        disincentives or lack of incentives to work in the                                retirement  income system.

For the first time in Canada’s history, there are now more individuals over the age of 65 than there are children under the age of 15. As the population ages and more individuals exit the workforce, this will put pressure on labour force growth that could adversely impact economic growth. Canada will have to rely more heavily on productivity growth and increased workforce participation of all Canadians, including older individuals, to maintain its pace of improvement in living standards.

In addition, rapid globalization and technological changes have led to the changing nature of work. The traditional employee/employer relationship is evolving, sometimes leading to less secure relationships, as well as increases in different types of work. The economy is also restructuring, resulting in more opportunities that require highly skilled and knowledgeable workers. Making the adjustment to this new reality is going to be hard for both employers and workers, both young and old.

Canada’s population is evolving and is experiencing significant changes: its population is aging due to lower fertility rates and longer life expectancy. Some of us baby boomers (born during the post-World War II boom between 1946 and 1960) have already transitioned into retirement, while many others begin preparing their retirement plans. Hence, the age structure is changing in Canada—the number of people aged 55 and over increased from 6 million in the mid-1990s (around 20 percent of the population) to 11 million in 2016 (around 30 percent of the population). Although not all regions are equally affected by population aging, the number of individuals 55 and over is expected to reach 17 million by 2036 (almost half of the expected population).

Furthermore, given that women have a longer life expectancy than men, the gender distribution is much different at later ages. While women account for a little more than half the population in Canada (50.9 percent in 2016), among people aged 65 years and older, the number of women exceeds the number of men by more than 20 percent, and in the 85-and-older population, there are about two women for every man. This gender gap is serious as women can not save the same amount as men for retirement because of the inequality of pay. As a result, women are more likely to end up needing help from society as they age.

Ageism in Canada

 We have a new Minister of Seniors at the Federal level in Canada, and she has been busy sending out information about programs and services to seniors. It is a good idea to stay informed about programs and the organizations I belong to are sending out a lot of information. The latest is a study on Ageism in Canada so if you are interested here is the information

Greetings,

We are pleased to inform you that the Federal, Provincial and Territorial (FPT) Ministers Responsible for Seniors Forum has launched a consultation on ageism. We are looking to better understand and address the negative impacts of ageism towards older adults in Canada.

This public consultation focuses on how older adults experience ageism, and potential solutions to address it. 

How to participate:

We invite you to take part in this consultation by completing the questionnaire and sharing your story on our website by September 30, 2022. 

We are interested in your personal experiences, how you or someone you know has been affected by ageism, if there were any supports or programs that helped in the situation and anything that could have been done to prevent it.

This consultation will be followed by community-led group discussions, roundtables (by invitation only), as well as engagement discussions with members of First Nations, Métis and Inuit groups in the fall of 2022.

Your feedback will be summarized in a What We Heard Report. This will help to inform the development of a Policy Options Report, which will propose approaches, initiatives, and strategies to address ageism in Canada.

Visit our website for more information and share this email within your network. Please like and share on social media to help spread the word about this important consultation.

We are also pleased to let you know that the Forum has recently released two reports on Ageism, which you are invited to read at your convenience:

·  An Examination of the Social and Economic Impacts of Ageism

·  A Case Study on Ageism During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Thank you in advance for your support.

 

Another post on Ageism

Ageism--Stereotyping and Discrimination Ageism has been defined as the process of systematic stereotyping and discrimination against older people because of age, with a distinct valuing of younger age groups. It is really any prejudice or discrimination against or in favour of any age group.

Regarding older adults, ageism allows people to covertly justify certain discriminatory behaviours, and tolerate activities toward older adults that would be considered unacceptable if experienced by other adults. Systemic ageism can include the design and everyday operations of workplaces, services, programs and facilities.

Discrimination may also happen when a rule, condition, policy or practice that is the same for everyone has an unfair effect on a person because of their age. Institutional ageism includes missions, rules, and practices that discriminate against individuals and or groups because of their older age:

•        Choices regarding scarce resources (respirators during COVID for younger people before seniors)

•        Mandatory retirement

•        Absence of older persons in clinical trials (vaccinations, drugs)

•        Devaluing of older persons in cost-benefit analyses (not valuing their skill set, experience, and volunteering)

Ageism has been called a “pervasive and sinister plague” in Canada. The most commonly named forms of ageism faced by seniors in Canada were:

•        treating them as if they’re invisible (41 percent);

•        acting as if they have nothing to contribute (38 percent);

•        assuming they’re incompetent (27 percent).

Canadians over 65 perceived a variety of perpetrators for these attitudes, including:

•        people younger than themselves (56 percent);

•        health care professionals and the health care system (34 percent); and

•        the government (27 percent).

Age cases tend to be treated differently than other discrimination cases… which in comparable circumstances would generate outrage if the ground of discrimination were say race, sex or disability.

Paradoxically the people who like old people are more likely to engage in ‘over accommodating’ language (“dear” “mum” “sweetie”) Ageism and healthcare Seniors are often interacting with the healthcare system, for obvious reasons.

·        Absence of services for older adults

·        Focus on acute care and cure rather than chronic care

·        Age-based decision-making in health (“age rationing”)

·        Making decisions about the quality of older people’s lives

·        Paternalism

·        Omission from clinical trials

·        Less treatment for mental health issues (15% of mental health care; 80% for 20-64)

·        Forced decisions

·        Also gender bias – more radical mastectomies, less reconstructive surgery

·        Overmedication of older adults:

o   anxiety meds double over 65

o   hypnotic medication use more than triple

o   Polypharmacy’ – multiple drugs (2out of 3 Canadians age 65+ take at least 5 prescription medications. 1 out of 4 Canadians age 65+ takes at least 10 prescription medications.)

o   Medication can be a form of ‘restraint’ in care homes (over medication)

o   40% of all emergency department visits by older adults are medication related

Video on Ageism On Aging Canadian Conversations: Ageism with Margaret Gillis - YouTube (30 minutes)

Ageism is alive and well in Canada

 In Canada in the 1980s-early 1990s, a subtle change started to take place in society as neoliberalism’s creeping ideological rhetoric entered the public domain. The mantra of “individual (or personal) responsibility” and “choice” could be found over and over again in everything from academic publications to the mainstream press. This rhetoric was accompanied by a political-economic shift that included the privatization and profitization of many of Canada’s social welfare programs.

The term ageism has had different interpretations since it was first coined by Robert Butler in 1969 when he described “age discrimination or age-ism [as] the prejudice by one age toward other age groups”. A current definition provided by the World Health Organization in 2020 states that ageism is “the stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination against people on the basis of their age” (2020). Ageism is widespread across the globe and in most societies such as Canada’s it “is the most socially ‘normalized’ of any prejudice and is not widely countered – like racism or sexism”.

Media has helped to foster ageism through the negative stereotyping of older people, resulting in age discrimination in the workforce, and the marginalization, and even exclusion, of older people in their communities, which in turn “have negative impacts on the health and well-being” of the older population.

An earlier Canadian survey produced for the International Federation on Aging, The Revera Report on Ageism (2012), reflected the information provided by the World Health Organization 2020- 2021. While any age group can be the recipient of ageism, the two groups most singled out today are the young and the old, but with the greater proportion of ageism focused on older adults. The Revera Report found that ageism is the most tolerated form of social discrimination in the country, more so than either gender or race-based prejudice. It revealed that the most common forms of age discrimination are: 1) treating seniors as if they are invisible; 2) acting as if they have nothing to contribute; 3) assuming they are incompetent; and 4) allowing ageism to take place in the workplace and housing. The Revera Report also found that in general 89% of Canadians hold a negative view of aging, while Generations X and Y are the most likely group to have formed negative opinions on aging, which includes perceptions that people 75 and older are unpleasant, dependent, grumpy, and frail (p.10). A more recent Revera Report on Ageism published in May 2016, found that ageism “continue[d] to be widespread in Canada” and is still the “most tolerated form of social prejudice in Canada, with more than 42% of Canadians citing ageism, which is double to that of racism (20%) and sexism (17%)”.

Since the early 1800s, old age in our culture has been perceived in either a positive or negative light based on a number of factors:

1)    “a ‘good’ old age was depicted by good health, virtue, self-reliance and salvation;

2)    a ’bad’ old age reflected sickness, sin, dependence, decay and disease”

Victorian morality also associated ‘bad’ old age with sin, as well as decay and dependence. Prior to the industrialization of the 1800s-1900s, a primarily rural economy relied on experience that came with age, enabling older (and healthy) adults to fall into the ‘good’ old age category that had value within the society. The attitude toward ageing changed with the increasing industrialization which relied on strength and speed, qualities found in young workers that would increase productivity and profit.

At the same time, the ‘Cult of Youth’ developed in Hollywood in the 1910s-1920s became ingrained in the consciousness of North Americans and much of the Western world. This idea reinforces the belief that old age should be avoided regardless of the consequences. Association with older people is discouraged based on the grounds that doing so would “devalue” the younger person in contact with the aging individual.

 

Ageism and neoliberal thought

 Margaret Thatcher in 1981 said, “There is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women and there are families. Economics is the method; the object is to change the soul.”

She was one of the leaders in the development of neoliberalism in the late 1970s–early 1980s, which was shaped by the ideology of individualism rooted in 19th century America. Regan, Thatcher and others provided the foundation for capitalism and the subsequent introduction of neoliberalism into world systems of government. Emphasizing self-reliance, independence, and productivity, individualism negatively characterizes any form of weakness or dependence. Building on the ideology of individualism, neoliberalism contributes to the belief that to have value as an older person in our society, you must continue to be healthy and productive or have enough wealth to maintain complete independence.

And two of the primary tenets of neoliberal ideology – ‘choice’ and ‘personal responsibility – provide the method to maintain independence in old age.

The neoliberal policies put into place by Thatcher and Reagan rapidly became the new orthodoxy of economics that has dominated the political-economic structure of western nations since the mid-1980s. Neoliberalism holds that state involvement in public affairs inflicts a negative impact on the social and economic development of its citizens; and proposed that by reducing the power of the state, power would be transferred to the individual, a supposedly ideal situation embraced by nations with a strong belief in.

According to neoliberal thought, all forms of social solidarity were to be dissolved in favour of individualism, private property, personal responsibility and family values. But although neoliberalism promises less government intervention in public affairs, neoliberal governments in fact remain involved in the administration of public institutions. However, rather than provide government support of public services, an economic market model of the industry has been imposed on public institutions. The purpose of government is thus transformed from a system that protects the interests of its citizens, to one that protects the interests of corporations.

Contrary to neoliberal thought, aging is not simply an individual activity. It takes place within a number of sociopolitical and economic variables, as well as health influences, which may often be beyond the ability of the individual to control. Consequently, research has shown that income and social status, two of the determinants of health, are among the primary factors affecting individual health, with the greater the disparity of income, the greater the differences in health.

 

institutional ageism

 A few months ago, I was invited to a meeting by the local Member of Parliament to talk about what the group Wilson Senior Advisory does for seniors. The meeting was scheduled and included other organizations in the Tri-Cities that deal with seniors and their issues. I was appreciative of the offer to speak. I did and the message appeared to be well received. What struck me while watching a great Netflix series called “Explained”. In one of the episodes, they talk about why how interact with each other in an episode called Political Correctness Explained. One of the points that was made is that we like to deal with people and ideas that are the same as us, and we don’t like change.

When I was at the meeting dealing with senior issues, I realized that I was the only senior, (over 65) all of the other groups were represented by younger people (under 55) and I realized that seniors will have a problem getting their ideas through because the people running the programs do not understand at a practical level the issues we deal with at times. They understand them on a theoretical level, which is good for a time.

I am dealing with this in the opening of our new community center, as the programmers and the managers are all under 50 and therefore have an understanding but not a clear understanding of issues. For example, the programmers have put senior programs into the facility from morning until 3:00 and they have opened up the rooms to youth and ended all senior programs at 3:00. The assumption they are making is that by 3:00 seniors need to rest and therefore programming for them after 3:00 is a waste of time as the programs will not be filled. A form of institutional ageism.

However, as I thought about this, I realized that seniors have an opportunity to encourage the city to set up some intergenerational programming from 3:00 to 6:00, so rather than the seniors being kicked out at 3:00, or having to move, and youth taking over, perhaps there is another way, and we can use the time to set up intergenerational programming working with the youth.  I will let you know how the city and the seniors react to the idea.

 

A study of ageing through photographs

Linda Outcalt is a research assistant with the UVic site for the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) and a recent Interdisciplinary Studies graduate. Her doctoral dissertation, Aged by Popular Culture, examined how “perceptions of age and ageing are shaped by Western media and popular culture, and subsequently result in an ageism that is normalized and largely accepted by the general population.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined ageism as the stereotypes, prejudices and discriminatory behaviours that are directed towards individuals on the basis of their age. WHO has said that “Ageism starts in childhood and is reinforced over time.  [It] often intersects and interacts with other forms of stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination, including ableism, sexism, and racism.” The goal of Aged by Popular Culture was to encourage critical thinking that could: a) result in positive attitudes towards ageing; b) improve intergenerational connections, and c) reduce the negative effects of ageism.

Two groups of participants (individuals 20 to 35 years of age and individuals 65 to 80 years of age) were asked to create six photographs that captured: a) their interpretation of old age as generally depicted in the media and popular culture; b) their interpretation of what old age is or actually looks like; and c) their vision of how old age should be portrayed in the media and popular culture. Participants were then asked a series of interview questions regarding the photos.

Seven themes emerged from this work:

1)  the ‘cult of youth’ and the anti-ageing industry – an emphasis on youth in popular culture and a focus on remaining youthful;

2)  healthy ageing - an emphasis on active and healthy lives through engagement in a variety of activities;

3)  time, creativity and relationships – an emphasis on the creative, emotional and spiritual life of older individuals whether with other older adults or through intergenerational relationships;

4)  frailty and care – an emphasis on physical frailty and/or cognitive impairment resulting in the stereotyping of older adults;

5)  gender and class - bias and inequality – an emphasis on a model of successful ageing which fails to adequately consider determinants of health (e.g., financial stability);

6)  what is old age – a perception that old age is “just a number”, “a socially constructed and/or meaningless concept” or “a stage in life”;

7)  moving beyond stereotypes – an emphasis on replacing negative stereotypes regarding old age with a positive and more realistic view that embraces ageing as a part of life.

The website developed through this research is designed to be used as a teaching tool in schools, post-secondary institutions, seniors’ centres and other organizations, and by the general public. For more information, see https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/outcaltl/

 

This Chair Rocks

 If you want to know more about ageism, here is a great resource with good solid information. The author has been recognized as one of the worlds most influential women, her name is Ashton Applewhite, and she is fighting a war against ageism that all of us face. You can help by visiting her site called This chair rocks and by buying her books. On her site she says the following. People are happiest at the beginnings and the ends of their lives. Only 2.5% of Americans over 65 live in nursing homes. Older people enjoy better mental health than the young or middle-aged. Dementia rates are falling, fast. So how come so many of us unthinkingly assume that depression, diapers, and dementia lie ahead?

That the 20th century’s astonishing leap in life expectancy is a disaster-in-the making? Underlying all the handwringing is ageism: discrimination that sidelines and silences older people. So, I’ve written a book. I blog about it. I led the team that developed Old School, a clearinghouse of anti-ageism resources. I am the voice of Yo, Is This Ageist? (Go ahead, ask me.) I’ve written a consciousness-raising booklet. And I speak widely. All tools to help catalyze a movement to make discrimination on the basis of age as unacceptable as any other kin

She also defines Ageism

What Is Ageism?

Ageism is stereotyping and discrimination on the basis of a person’s age. We experience it any time someone assumes that we’re “too old” for something—a task, a haircut, a relationship—instead of finding out who we are and what we’re capable of. Or “too young;” ageism cuts both ways, although in a youth-obsessed society olders, bear the brunt of it.

Like racism and sexism, ageism serves a social and economic purpose: to legitimize and sustain inequalities between groups. It’s not about how we look. It’s about how people in power assign meaning to how we look.

Stereotyping—the assumption that all members of a group are the same—underlies ageism (as it does all “isms”). Stereotyping is always a mistake, but especially when it comes to age because the older we get, the more different from one another we become.

Attitudes about age—as well as race and gender—start to form in early childhood. Over a lifetime they harden into a set of truths: “just the way it is.” Unless we challenge ageist stereotypes—Old people are incompetent. Wrinkles are ugly. It’s sad to be old—we feel shame and embarrassment instead of taking pride in the accomplishment of aging. That’s internalized ageism.

By blinding us to the benefits of aging and heightening our fears, ageism makes growing older far harder than it has to be. It damages our sense of self, segregates us, diminishes our prospects, and actually shortens lives.

What are the antidotes?

¶   Awareness: the critical starting point is to acknowledge our own prejudices about age and aging. (Download a copy of Who me, Ageist? How to Start a Consciousness Raising Group.) Then we can start to see that “personal problems”—such as not being able to get a job or being belittled or feeling patronized—are actually widely shared social problems that require collective action.

¶   Integration: connect with people of all ages. An equitable society for all ages requires intergenerational collaboration.

¶   Activism: watch for ageist behaviors and attitudes in and around us, challenge them, and create language and models that support every stage of life