Showing posts with label bc politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bc politics. Show all posts

Monday, October 24, 2011

Harry & Bess


Harry Truman was a different kind of President.  He probably made as many, or more important decisions regarding the history of the USA as any of the other 42 Presidents preceding him.  However, a measure of his greatness may rest on what he did after he left the White House.
 
The only asset he had when he died was the house he lived in, which was in Independence Missouri .  His wife had inherited the house from her mother and father and other than their years in the White House, they lived their entire lives there.
 
When he retired from office in 1952 his income was a U.S. Army pension reported to have been $13,507.72 a year.  Congress, noting that he was paying for his stamps and personally licking them, granted him an 'allowance' and, later, a retroactive pension of $25,000 per year.
 
After President Eisenhower was inaugurated,  Harry and Bess drove home to Missouri by themselves.  There was no Secret Service following them.
 
When offered corporate positions at large salaries, he declined, stating, "You don't want me.  You want the office of the President, and that doesn't belong to me.  It belongs to the American people and it's not for sale."
 
Even later, on May 6, 1971, when Congress was preparing to award him the Medal of Honor on his 87th birthday, he refused to accept it, writing, "I don't consider that I have done anything which should be the reason for any award, Congressional or otherwise."
 
As president he paid for all of his own travel expenses and food.
 
Modern politicians have found a new level of success in cashing in on the Presidency, resulting in untold wealth.  Today, many in Congress also have found a way to become quite wealthy while enjoying the fruits of their offices. Political offices are now for sale (cf. Illinois ).
 
Good old Harry Truman was correct when he observed, "My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician.  And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!"

I say dig him up and clone him!
WE can find very good use of his clone here in BC !!!
 

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Are BC Liberal Ministers that out of touch?

This is a question that there is an obvious answer to, however on  the 16th September 2011 Merv Ritchie in the Kitimat Daily offers proof that some of them really are out of touch with reality. The article is worth a read

American Workers take rare Canadian Jobs

Today the Globe and Mail is quoting John Les (now Parlimentary Secretary to the Premier of BC Clark) with this statement on employment;

 "Everybody is looking for work around home, but (they) may not be aware that there are jobs available in Kitimat or in Terrace or Fort St. John. That's not for everybody, but if you're a young person looking for a job, maybe horizons need to be expanded a bit,"

Really? There are jobs in Kitimat but from all reports to get one and get fair benefits of the employment at the dismantling of the Smelters at the Rio Tinto Alcan site you need to be an American. Canadians are being mistreated and for every one Canadian hired at least three are from as far away as Florida.

For three months the Terrace Daily has been receiving calls from Canadian residents; those living in Terrace, Kitimat and the lower mainland complaining about the treatment and the excessive American hiring practices while locals seem to be sidestepped or mistreated to such an extent they quit. Some of the observations are quite disturbing. In one case a pair of Iron workers observed a man using a cutting torch without the proper breathing apparatus. While dismantling the smelter lines cutting torches are used to break apart the components into manageable sections. Some of this is stainless steel and almost everything has aluminum dust and pebbles around it. Stainless and aluminum give off highly toxic gasses when burnt in this high heat fashion.

The report delivered to us details how the young men in their twenties willing work without the proper masks and breathing apparatus to not look like they are not frightened to do anything. Jobs are scarce and they don’t want to lose what they have. However the American hires all have the proper gear or are in locations that are not as hazardous.

All of the demolition work is low skilled labour; forklifts, excavators, cutting torches and general labour. This is after all a destruction job, not a fine tuned smelter construction operation. Most of these tasks require a minimum of training and the other tasks which require more, such as an excavator operator and welder, could find an abundance of local BC workers. Yet today dozens upon dozens of jobs easily performed by local workers are being taken up by imported Americans.

One just has to take a short drive around Kitimat and look at all the licence plates. It is like taking an American Geography lesson.

And then there is the salt in the wound. The American workers are provided a Living Away From Home Allowance (LOA) of between $135 to $140. Canadians are expected to stay in the bunkhouses or are provided a gas stipend of $20/day. This has created an environment of disharmony and distaste.

Wages haven’t been the issue; it has been the immigration without offering to jobs to Canadians first. Some claim the Companies doing the remediation work have side stepped the rules calling almost all the new workers supervisory or highly skilled staff.

In 2002 the same type of controversy happened on the other side of the border. Canadians were hired at a higher rate than offered to the American workers in Portland, Maine. Protests outside the gates of the facility took place and the Unions were quite bluntly ‘pissed’. Hiring was happening across the border in Canada and non Union workers were brought in.

There are dozens of former Eurocan workers and ex logging company locals who are struggling to make their mortgage payments. Watching all the American plates drive by, parked at the bars and restaurants, sporting happy employed smiles would be enough to send a poor long time resident into a tizzy.

Safety standards are being sidestepped and complaining might see you out of work while a compliant son or father of a “Supervisory staff member” from Alabama will arrive to take your place.

As many of those employed now state to a new hire, “Welcome to the shit show”.

It is against the rules to bring in a camera or recording device, the place is a security lockdown. Getting to the truth and to the straight goods is a near impossibility but the evidence is with the unemployed middle aged worker in Terrace and Kitimat and the numerous USA workers now living and working at the smelter site. It doesn’t take a genius.

And what was that Minister Les said? Oh yeah,

"Everybody is looking for work around home, but (they) may not be aware that there are jobs available in Kitimat or in Terrace or Fort St. John. That's not for everybody, but if you're a young person looking for a job, maybe horizons need to be expanded a bit,"

 The appropriate response from Les would be to get his government to raid the entire site and see just what is going on there. A surprise visit with WorkSafe BC would be fun. But that would take a government with a backbone, (notice how I avoided using that other word, balls?) one that would stand up for the average British Columbian, the working stiff. But then we all know the BC Liberal record on that issue.

And Dear Mr. Les, pray tell, where are these jobs in Terrace you mention?

Monday, September 12, 2011

There is a revolution brewing in the US

While the MSM in the US and Canada plays up and focuses on the Tea Party and the move to the right in our political landscape, there is another movement taking place in the US and hopefully soon in Canada.  Using Social Networks to get out the word these movements to take back the country from the top 1% are alive and well. No wonder governments in the UK, Canada and the US want to give the police power to close down or control these networks.


For more information on what our friends in the US are doing, take a look at these three sites to start AmpedStatus.org  where you will find information on protests that did not make the MSM in either the US or Canada. The second is  US Uncut which is a call for action and which lists where and how people can get involved. TThe third site is October 2011 and they are calling for a day of action on October 6th in Washington DC. The following is from their site:

What is this action?
This is a gathering of people who support peace and social, economic and environmental justice. Our intention is to stay in Washington, D.C. as a unified presence. We will use ongoing actions of nonviolent resistance to disrupt the forces that corrupt our political process and undermine our rights and human needs. We will demand changes that shift power away from concentrated corporate capital and free us to create solutions that lead to a just and sustainable future.

Where and when will the action take place?

The action will begin in Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C. (at 13th St. and Pennsylvania Avenue NW) on Thursday, October 6th in the morning.

The following is from an article in the Nation about US uncut. The link to the article is here


Q: What is US Uncut?


A: US Uncut is an anti–tax dodging movement. According to the group, they are “about taking action against unnecessary and unfair cuts to public services across the US.” They believe the country isn’t broke, but rather the elite and wealthy are permitted to play by a different set of rules that permits them to shelter their revenue in foreign tax havens and skirt other taxes.What do they hope to accomplish?


A: Gibson told In These Times, "We want to re frame the national debate about how to deal with this recession: Instead of saying 'what can we cut from the budget because we can't possibly raise taxes on anyone,' why don't we make the two-thirds of corporations that don't pay any income taxes pay their fair share? If we did, the U.S. Treasury would recoup $100 billion a year, a trillion dollars in a decade."


I am not hopeful of a similar movement to US uncut, in Canada but we are slowly waking up to the issues that the lack of revenues caused by big corporations not paying their share, can cause to governments. While we are becoming aware, we are still not moving ahead to stop them. As an example of the inaction of the people, Rafe Mair has a wonderful blog on the death of BC Hydro which again shows how the power brokers in BC are robbing the people with the support of the government and how a small group has been warning us of this for years. If you have not already read his article it is here. The following is from his blog: This will be a short blog because the point is simple…and devastating.

Mark down August 12, 2011 as the day BC Hydro all but concluded its suicide mission, with the Campbell/Clark government and the Review Panel playing the role of Dr. Jack Kervorkian.

When you sort through the announcement by Rich Coleman and the verbose report itself, you learn that BC Hydro will cut its future costs by 50%, which in practical terms means this: Hydro will be unable to upgrade its facilities and build generators on flood control dams which means they will buy more and more power from more and more private power producers – which is surplus to their needs – buggering up more and more rivers and streams, thus fulfilling the Campbell/Clark government’s ambition to privatize power in BC.
  For the rest go
here

Saturday, August 27, 2011

The reframing of the HST vote has started

The HST is dead, but never under estimate the power of the elite to continue to try to change the public view on the results of the vote. The business community and the power politicians lost the vote, so what has been their reaction. According to a search of Google news, the reaction has been to reframe the results to doom and gloom in an attempt to get voters afraid because of their decision. I noticed this afternoon watching the mainstream media TV news that the ballot results were framed with the negative fallout from the vote being the last story in the news. Therefore, I suspect the framing of this story went something like this. First, we report the results of the vote, and then we show reaction from the politicians those who wanted to remove the HST. Secondly, we show the reaction of those who wanted to keep the HST, then we move to stories about the fallout this will mean to the province with reports from the social media about how terrible the results are to the people of BC.
This approach leads the viewer to think the HST results are reported fairly while leaving the viewer with an uneasy feeling about the vote
 A quick tour of Google news of 44 stories filed after the results of the vote were announced, only seven were positive while the rest focused on the negative results of the vote.

It appears to me that the MSM is now moving to make the electorate afraid of will happen next because of our actions. So any downturn in the economy or cutback in services will be shown by the MSM to be because of the uncertainty caused by the HST vote. Watch for a movement over the next few months—which will come from the public—to either raise the PST or to tax more items.

We have to remind people that the HST was a tax shift away from corporations to the individual and was an unfair tax and that is why it was defeated.

Update August 28th: Harv Oberfeld on his blog, Keeping it Real has a slightly different take on the move to reframe the conversation on the GST , which has more details about where the Main Stream Media is going to take the conversation: I quote from Harv's blog:

If anyone think the war over the HST is over … you are wrong, wrong, wrong.
The government, big business and the very wealthy (look at the ridings that voted highest in favour of the tax!) will not end their ten-year campaign to shift more and more of the tax burden away from them and onto the shoulders of the middle class.
They … and their media propaganda mouthpieces … will now begin a major campaign to make everyone who voted “Yes” to extinguish the HST THINK they’ve made a huge mistake.
Here’s how it will go down. (In fact, it has already started.) For the rest of his views go here

Some examples from Google follow.
Liberal-held ridings turned tide against HST
Vancouver Sun - ‎24 minutes ago‎
VICTORIA - As the BC Liberals examine the detailed results from the referendum on the harmonized sales tax, they may find small consolation in the two dozen or so ridings that overcame the backlash and supported the tax. All but one have been reliably ...

Vancouver Sun - Andrew A. Duffy - ‎1 hour ago‎
British Columbians who think BC will snap back into the old provincial sales tax system following the death of the harmonized sales tax could be in for a surprise, according to some ...

After HST, what's next?
Vancouver Sun - Rob Shaw - ‎1 hour ago‎
BC Premier Christy Clark speaks after the Harmonized Sales Tax was defeated in a referendum, Friday, Aug. 26, 2011. British Columbia will revert to its old provincial sales tax within a year and a ...

Voters Say HST Must Go
/A\ News Vancouver Island - ‎1 hour ago‎
VICTORIA - The HST is dead. British Columbia voters have had their say and they have said the Harmonized Sales Tax must go. It's days are numbered. More than 1.6 million BC voters cast a ballot in the HST referendum and more than half of them said yes ...

/A\ News Vancouver Island - ‎1 hour ago‎
ESQUIMALT — They won't be hanging up the nail-gun now at Downs Construction, but the Harmonized Sales Tax was kind to the company's 55 employees. "The first thing my wife and I did is calculate the savings the HST meant to us, and distributed those ...

Vancouver Sun - ‎3 hours ago‎
July 23, 2009: Premier Gordon Campbell announces that BC will harmonize the five per cent GST and seven per cent HST. Dec. 24, 2009: Former Social Credit premier Bill Vander Zalm's Fight-HST group submits a proposal to scrap the HST. ...

Clark mum on whether HST defeat will spark early election
Vancouver Sun - Rob Shaw - ‎3 hours ago‎
BC Premier Christy Clark isn't saying whether the public's rejection of her government's harmonized sales tax is enough to plunge the province into an early election.. Two years of bumbling on the ...

Vancouver Sun - Lindsay Kines - ‎3 hours ago‎
Always a divisive issue, the decision by BC voters to scrap the harmonized sales tax exposed familiar fault lines among businesses Friday. A number of business leaders saw the return to ...

After the HST: What will happen to the referendum process in BC?
Globe and Mail - Sunny Dhillon - ‎3 hours ago‎
The HST referendum succeeded only because of a miscalculation by former premier Gordon Campbell, who bet he could convince British Columbians to keep the tax and get away with lowering the vote's requirements, say political science experts. ...

Vancouver Sun - Jonathan Fowlie - ‎4 hours ago‎
Workers at the HST drop-off centre gather the ballots, August 5, at Vancouver's City Square mall. BC voted to scrap the HST. VICTORIA — British Columbia's harmonized sales tax will be dead by ...

HST defeat brings back harder edge of BC's protest politics
Globe and Mail - ‎4 hours ago‎
For most of the past decade, British Columbia politics were almost unrecognizable. After almost 30 years of near constant political turmoil and larger-than-life politicians who seemed to revel in the province's zany, often unstable political culture, ...  

HST vote a move in the wrong direction
Globe and Mail - ‎4 hours ago‎
After more than two years of public discussion, the results are in: BC will leave the HST behind as of March 31, 2013, and revert to the two tax PST-GST system. I was a volunteer advisor to the 'pro-HST' side of the referendum, and so it is perhaps not ...  

The HST and the things we'll leave behind
Vancouver Sun (blog) - Derrick Penner - ‎4 hours ago‎
The people have spoken, the votes are in and government will respect the wishes of the electorate and repeal the HST to bring back the old PST and GST. I won't try to make an argument about whether this is good or bad, we have plenty of discussion ...  

Government ready to move forward in face of HST defeat
The Province - Cassidy Olivier - ‎5 hours ago‎
Finance Minster Kevin Falcon speaks to the media on the results of the HST referendum at the BC legislature in Victoria, BC August 26, 2011. Fight-HST boss Bill Vander Zalm emerged into the ... 

Surrey voters lead the charge against the HST
CTV.ca - ‎5 hours ago‎
The breakdown of votes for the harmonized sales tax shows a divide between Surrey voters and those who cast their ballots in the North Shore. Of the five ridings with the highest percentage voting to extinguish the tax, two were in Surrey. ...

Small business braces for double-trouble tax filing, but expect happy customers
Winnipeg Free Press - Tamsyn Burgmann - ‎6 hours ago‎
British Columbia Finance Minister Kevin Falcon responds to the results of the HST referendum at the BC Legislature in Victoria, BC, on Friday August 26, 2011. British Columbians have voted 54.73 percent in favour of abolishing the Harmonized Sales Tax ... 

The Newspaper's View: Time to turn corner on the HST
Vancouver Sun - ‎6 hours ago‎
Premier Christy Clark deserves recognition for mounting an effort to save the HST despite the fact that when she took over as Premier it was an unpopular cause. Even though 45 per cent of British Columbians voted to maintain the harmonized sales tax ... 

HST's defeat in BC shows danger of ruling by plebiscite
Globe and Mail - ‎6 hours ago‎
The people of British Columbia have passed up an excellent opportunity for their province's economy and thus for themselves, by voting against the Harmonized Sales Tax – a visible, neutral tax that favours productivity. BC will now have to wait for ...  

HST foes jumping for joy but others predict trouble ahead
CTV.ca - Bethany Lindsay - ‎7 hours ago‎
Those in the restaurant and fitness industries are breathing a sigh of relief after learning that BC voters turned down the HST, but business leaders warn the results will hurt the province's economy. Since the harmonized sales tax came into effect ... 

British Columbians reject HST in referendum
Toronto Star - Petti Fong - ‎7 hours ago‎
VANCOUVER—British Columbia residents have voted to ditch the HST, becoming the first jurisdiction in Canada to use a referendum to reject a government tax policy. Fifty-five per cent of BC voters rejected the harmonized sales tax, while just over 45 ... 

National Post editorial board: Lessons from BC's HST debacle
National Post (blog) - Jason Payne - ‎7 hours ago‎
British Columbia's voters have spoken — the province's Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) will be repealed. In a popular referendum, the results of which were made public on Friday, 55% supported repealing the controversial tax. The political debacle leading ... 

Christy Clark dodges election questions after HST loss
CBC.ca - ‎8 hours ago‎
Beginning of Story Content BC Premier Christy Clark refuses to rule out the possibility of a fall election following the failure of her Liberal government to win the HST referendum. Results of the binding referendum were released Friday and showed 55 ... 

Ottawa Citizen - ‎9 hours ago‎
When, in 2009, the government of premier Gordon Campbell announced it would be introducing a Harmonized Sales Tax, this not long after an election in which it had promised not to do any such thing, many British Columbians were justifiably annoyed. ...  

HST defeat 'probably catastrophic' to BC business
Vancouver Sun - Gordon Hamilton - ‎9 hours ago‎
John Allan, president of the BC Council of Forest Industries, said a poll of his members on the impact of the HST revealed that the tax saved the larger companies 'many millions a year. ...
CTV.ca - ‎9 hours ago‎
Elections BC Acting Chief Electoral Officer Craig James passes out the results of the Harmonized Sales Tax referendum to reporters at the BC Legislature n Victoria, BC, on Friday, Aug. 26, 2011. (Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Former premier Bill ... 

Interactive graphic: HST vote by the numbers
Vancouver Sun - Chad Skelton - ‎9 hours ago‎
NOTE: Use the interactive chart above to see how BC voted in the HST referendum. The tabs at the top will guide you through different ways of looking at the numbers. Support for scrapping the HST was ...

British Columbia: The mother of all tax revolts
Seattle Post Intelligencer (blog) - ‎9 hours ago‎
Voters in British Columbia have rejected a 12 percent “harmonized sales tax” in a province-wide referendum, after a massive taxpayer revolt collected signatures to force a public vote on the issue. A total of 1.6 million voters cast ballots in the ...  

British Columbia Votes To Kill Merged Sales Tax
Wall Street Journal - Nirmala Menon - ‎9 hours ago‎
(Adds comment from former premier in paragraph three, details of tax in paragraph four and comments from province's finance minister in paragraph five.) By Nirmala Menon Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES OTTAWA (Dow Jones)--Residents of British Columbia, ...  

Bill Vander Zalm on the successful fight against the HST
Vancouver Sun - Laura Kane - ‎9 hours ago‎
Fight HST organizers Bill Vander Zalm (centre), Chris Delaney (right) and Bill Tieleman (left) celebrate at BC Supreme Court in Vancouver on Friday, August 26, 2011 after the HST referendum results ... 

Would you like to see HST repealed in your province?
CBC.ca - ‎10 hours ago‎
By Community Team An HST protest outside the British Columbia Liberal Leadership Convention in February 2011. The tax will be repealed after a binding referendum. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press) After tallying the results of a binding referndum, ... 

BC votes to scrap HST
National Post (blog) - ‎10 hours ago‎
VICTORIA — British Columbians have voted to scrap their Harmonized Sales Tax, Elections BC announced Friday. The results of the provincial referendum mean BC will now begin a transition back to its former provincial sales tax. ...  

How Vancouver voted in the HST Referendum
Vancouver Sun (blog) - Jeff Lee - ‎10 hours ago‎
It's unclear yet what the fallout from the HST vote will be, but Friday's announcement that voters had scrapped the hated 12 per cent Harmonized Sales Tax likely means Premier Christy Clark will .. 

BC voters kill the province's HST in referendum
CTV.ca - ‎10 hours ago‎
British Columbia Finance Minister Kevin Falcon is reflected in a television screen as he responds to the results of the HST referendum at the BC Legislature in Victoria, BC, on Friday, Aug. 26, 2011. (Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS) British Columbia ... 

Wall Street Journal - Nirmala Menon - ‎11 hours ago‎
OTTAWA (Dow Jones)--Residents of British Columbia, Canada's westernmost province, have voted to reject an unpopular sales tax in a referendum, according to results released Friday. Elections BC said on its website that 54.73% of residents voted to ...

Editorial: It's time to end the uncertainty
Vancouver Sun - ‎11 hours ago‎
The message from the HST referendum is clear. What's needed now is an equally clear response from the government — one that goes beyond the plans to bring back the provincial sales tax by March 2013. The province's economy has been damaged by more than ... 

It's going to be hard for Liberals to put the HST debacle behind them
Vancouver Sun - Vaughn Palmer - ‎11 hours ago‎
The ballots are in and the votes are almost all tallied, but questions still remain regarding what will be the political outcome post-HST vote. VICTORIA - The media alert issued by the BC ...

Friday, August 26, 2011

Iceland's on-going Revolution

A good news story for these troubled times: We should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests, that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign. That’s why it is not in the news anymore.


.
The following is from blogger BC Mary and was published on August 8th. It is worth a read:
 
Comment from BC Mary:
I pass it along, as it seems to answer some of my own questions about "What happened to Iceland after it went down the slippery slope of financial meltdown?"


MON AUG 01, 2011
Iceland's On-going Revolution
by Deena Stryker

An Italian radio program's story about Iceland’s on-going revolution is a stunning example of how little our media tells us about the rest of the world. Americans may remember that at the start of the 2008 financial crisis, Iceland literally went bankrupt. The reasons were mentioned only in passing, and since then, this little-known member of the European Union fell back into oblivion.

As one European country after another fails or risks failing, imperiling the Euro, with repercussions for the entire world, the last thing the powers that be want is for Iceland to become an example. Here's why:

Five years of a pure neo-liberal regime had made Iceland, (population 320 thousand, no army), one of the richest countries in the world. In 2003 all the country’s banks were privatized, and in an effort to attract foreign investors, they offered on-line banking whose minimal costs allowed them to offer relatively high rates of return. The accounts, called IceSave, attracted many English and Dutch small investors. But as investments grew, so did the banks’ foreign debt. In 2003 Iceland’s debt was equal to 200 times its GNP, but in 2007, it was 900 percent. The 2008 world financial crisis was the coup de grace. The three main Icelandic banks, Landbanki, Kapthing and Glitnir, went belly up and were nationalized, while the Kroner lost 85% of its value with respect to the Euro. At the end of the year Iceland declared bankruptcy.

Contrary to what could be expected, the crisis resulted in Icelanders recovering their sovereign rights, through a process of direct participatory democracy that eventually led to a new Constitution. But only after much pain.

Geir Haarde, the Prime Minister of a Social Democratic coalition government, negotiated a two million one hundred thousand dollar loan, to which the Nordic countries added another two and a half million. But the foreign financial community pressured Iceland to impose drastic measures. The FMI and the European Union wanted to take over its debt, claiming this was the only way for the country to pay back Holland and Great Britain, who had promised to reimburse their citizens.

Protests and riots continued, eventually forcing the government to resign. Elections were brought forward to April 2009, resulting in a left-wing coalition which condemned the neoliberal economic system, but immediately gave in to its demands that Iceland pay off a total of three and a half million Euros. This required each Icelandic citizen to pay 100 Euros a month (or about $130) for fifteen years, at 5.5% interest, to pay off a debt incurred by private parties vis a vis other private parties. It was the straw that broke the reindeer’s back.

What happened next was extraordinary. The belief that citizens had to pay for the mistakes of a financial monopoly, that an entire nation must be taxed to pay off private debts was shattered, transforming the relationship between citizens and their political institutions and eventually driving Iceland’s leaders to the side of their constituents. The Head of State, Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify the law that would have made Iceland’s citizens responsible for its bankers’ debts, and accepted calls for a referendum.

Of course the international community only increased the pressure on Iceland. Great Britain and Holland threatened dire reprisals that would isolate the country. As Icelanders went to vote, foreign bankers threatened to block any aid from the IMF. The British government threatened to freeze Icelander savings and checking accounts. As Grimsson said: “We were told that if we refused the international community’s conditions, we would become the Cuba of the North. But if we had accepted, we would have become the Haiti of the North.” (How many times have I written that when Cubans see the dire state of their neighbor, Haiti, they count themselves lucky.)

In the March 2010 referendum, 93% voted against repayment of the debt. The IMF immediately froze its loan. But the revolution (though not televised in the United States), would not be intimidated. With the support of a furious citizenry, the government launched civil and penal investigations into those responsible for the financial crisis. Interpol put out an international arrest warrant for the ex-president of Kaupthing, Sigurdur Einarsson, as the other bankers implicated in the crash fled the country.

But Icelanders didn't stop there: they decided to draft a new constitution that would free the country from the exaggerated power of international finance and virtual money. (The one in use had been written when Iceland gained its independence from Denmark, in 1918, the only difference with the Danish constitution being that the word ‘president’ replaced the word ‘king’.)

To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to parliament for approval after the next elections.

Some readers will remember that Iceland’s ninth century agrarian collapse was featured in Jared Diamond’s book by the same name. Today, that country is recovering from its financial collapse in ways just the opposite of those generally considered unavoidable, as confirmed yesterday by the new head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde to Fareed Zakaria. The people of Greece have been told that the privatization of their public sector is the only solution. And those of Italy, Spain and Portugal are facing the same threat.

They should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests, that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign. That’s why it is not in the news anymore.

Ellie Bluestein
ellieb28@sbcglobal.net

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Firms have record $800 billion of cash but still won't hire

 A couple of great posts that face the issues and tell the truth about trickle down economics and how BC politics is in a Mess. The first is over at The Straight Goods, he speaks the truth without holding back and as a result, makes us think. This post certainly did this for me.  The second is an article that I saw through Accidental Deliberations another progressive blogger who posts some interesting ideas and does not hold back his punches. The article he references the title. Here an excerpt from his post

Tom Mills challenges the Cons to show any job creation whatsoever as a result of their non-stop corporate tax slashing:
The thing is, if corporate tax cuts really do create jobs, Flaherty should be able to demonstrate it by now with something a little more substantial than theories.
Canada's corporate tax rate has dropped incrementally from 22.1% in 2005-06 to 16.5% today. The government should be able to track what jobs this has created.
Show us the jobs, I'd say. And show us full-time industrial jobs, not part-time service ones. Private sector, not civil service.

Otherwise, maybe we should give trickle-up economics a try.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Another story probably not featured in the Vancouver papers

Rights violated in B.C. ecstasy case, judge says
posted by Jul 30, 2011 – 5:32 PM ET | Last Updated: Jul 30, 2011 5:37 PM ET in the Globe and Mail
Another example of how justice is not served and the provincial government still is in negotiations with the RCMP to police our province.  When will we get the leaders we need?

A British Columbia judge has dismissed charges against five men arrested after a 14-month Ecstasy investigation because the RCMP had “run roughshod” over their rights.
Provincial court Judge Paul Meyers blasted the conduct of the investigating officers, saying they acted in bad faith and violated the Charter rights of “each and every accused.”

The scathing judgment, dated June 21 and posted online this week, came after more than two dozen hearings carried out over two years.
Tin Lik Ho, Qing Hou, Shao Wei Huang, Yi Feng Kevin Li and Kai Lai Kyle Zhou were charged with Ecstasy production and production for the purpose of trafficking after a January 2007 raid on three homes and one vehicle in Richmond, B.C. Police seized nearly 100 kg of Ecstasy and nine pill presses, an operation worth an estimated $10-million.
In listing the numerous Charterbreaches,JudgeMeyers wrote that “one might have thought that the investigation took place before the Charter of Rights had been enacted.”
Police read the accused their rights in English, neglecting to bring an interpreter despite acknowledging they suspected Mandarin or Cantonese would be the primary language of most, if not all, of the men and English “their (very distant) second language,” Judge Meyers wrote.
“The police basically just closed their eyes to this real, potential problem, by doing nothing in advance to plan for it.”
When police arrested Mr. Li and Mr. Zhou, the pair were forced to sit on the front lawn in the middle of winter for more than half an hour in only their underwear while waiting to be hosed down for decontamination.
Police also failed to show the search warrant to the accused in at least one of the arrests and failed to file two search warrant reports on time. Police claimed ignorance for filing one three weeks late and had no explanation for not filing one at all.
“‘Ignorance of the law’ is no excuse for a lay person and it certainly is not an excuse for a police officer,” Judge Meyers wrote.
The Mounties’ decision to break down the door of one of the houses was criticized as excessive and unnecessary, and police gave contradictory statements on whether they had actually planned the “dynamic entry.”
Judge Meyers concluded that “the repute of the administration of justice would be adversely affected” if he were to allow any of the evidence gathered during the raids to be admitted in the trial.
While acknowledging there is a strong interest in prosecut-ing those accused of drug trafficking, “society also has a very strong and vested interest in making sure that the police do not run roughshod over the cherished rights that we have proudly enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms Act,” Judge Meyers said.
Michael Le Dressey, the Crown prosecutor on the case, said he could not discuss it and the media contact for the Public Prosecution Service of Canada could not be reached for comment. The Richmond RCMP’s media officer was unavailable and the police did not have anyone else available to address the judge’s criticisms.
The B.C. RCMP’s conduct has been publicly scrutinized in a handful of high-profile cases over the past two years.
A 2009 report on the 2007 Taser death of Robert Dziekanski at a Vancouver airport slammed the four officers in the incident as well as the follow-up investigation, saying police were too willing to use their Tasers and the investigation was flawed. The Mounties involved will appear in court in August on charges of perjury stemming from their testimony at a public inquiry.
An inquiry report released last year on the 1985 Air India bombings blamed a “cascading series of errors” by the government, the RCMP and the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) for the failure to prevent the bombing.
One of the men acquitted has launched a civil suit, claiming his Charter rights were violated in the prosecution and has named the RCMP as a defendant.
The RCMP has been criticized by federal prosecutors for the investigation of the human smuggling ship MV Ocean Lady that landed in B.C. two years ago. Prosecutors said the RCMP was rushed and sloppy in the interview process and their handling of seized documents and evidence.

Thursday, August 18, 2011


Interesting and disturbing post by RossK at the Gazetteer: on Wednesday, August 17, 2011


Ross starts off his post as follows:

Last week we mentioned an excellent bit of investigative digging from
Lindsay Kines of the Victoria Times-Colonist.  Essentially, Mr. Kines reported that developmentally disabled adults are being forced out of their group homes with very short notice and little or no consultation with their families 

Essentially, Mr. Kines reported that developmentally disabled adults are being forced out of their group homes with very short notice and little or no consultation with their families.

Based on numerous reports I have read, many of these folks can and do thrive under the constant care, attention, and nurturing they receive in these homes as opposed to, say, the large institutional warehouses they used be placed in or the 'shared living arrangements' they are now being forced into
To read more go here

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Here are another 96 everyday reasons to feel good about taxes….

The following examples of tax-supported public services were noted in a column by Heather Mallick, Toronto Star, April 16, 2011.
“Taxes pay for good things that we don’t think about until they vanish:
  1. traffic lights
  2. military graveyards
  3. restaurant kitchen inspection
  4. best-before dates on cheese
  5. transport-truck safety
  6. passports
  7. immunization
  8. filtration standards for urban cremation chimneys
  9. crosswalk-painting
  10. drainage
  11. bank deposit insurance
  12. child-support enforcement
  13. prison guards
  14. chiropractor regulation
  15. bridges
  16. tunnels
  17. flag design
  18. auditors-general
  19. airwaves usage
  20. census-taking
The rest of the list is here

Friday, August 5, 2011

Pension plans

I heard Michael Campbell the other morning talking on CKNW talking about the crises in the US and how people have to understand how this will affect their pension plans and from that he went on to say that Canada is not exempt and that out health care and our Canadian Pension Plans were going to be in trouble. The implication he left the listener with is that the Canadian government would have no choice but to cut pension plans and health care to the boomers, because of the current economic crises. Which is an outright lie, in my mind. The Globe and Mail recently had an article called  Pension plan funding improving in Canada by Janet McFarland posted on Tuesday's Globe and Mail,Published Last updated

Scott MacDonald, head of pensions, financial institutions and client service at RBC Dexia, said pension plans’ funding has improved due to strong investment performance as well as additional cash contributions from plan sponsors.
“Returns for pension plans have been double-digit territory for some time, and it’s been Canadian equities that have led the way,” Mr. MacDonald said.
RBC Dexia reported in April that Canadian pension funds earned a 2.3-per-cent return on investments in the first quarter this year and a 12-month return of 10.8 per cent as of March 31."

So private pension plans are in good shape as of June, how is the Canada Pension doing? According to the Canada Pension Investment Board results shown here, they have a rate of return of 11.8%.  Full Results here

The CPP Fund holdings summarized below are stated at fair value. Holdings are based on the Consolidated Statement of Investment Asset Mix contained in the CPP Investment Board's financial statements. These investments have been grouped based on the intent of the investment strategies of the underlying portfolios after allocating derivative contracts, associated money market securities and other investment receivables and liabilities to the asset classes to which they relate.
For the year ended March 31
Financial Overview
($ billions)

2011
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
CPP Fund*148.2 127.6105.5122.7 116.6 98.0
Net contributions 5.4 6.16.6 6.5 5.6 3.6
Investment income net of operating expenses*** 15.216.0(23.8) (0.4) 13.0 13.1
Investment Performance
(%) **
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Annual 11.914.9(18.6) (0.3) 12.9 15.5
Five-year
annualized
rate of return
3.34.02.810.710.48.6
Ten-year
annualized
rate of return
5.9 5.5 4.3 - - -
Investment Portfolio
($ billions)
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Equities
Canada 21.0 18.515.628.9 29.2 29.0
Foreign developed
markets
50.8 46.240.4 47.5 46.1 32.7
Emerging markets 7.6 6.54.6 0.7 - -
Fixed income
Bonds 37.635.428.430.229.227.2
Other debt 6.13.51.81.1--
Money market
securities
2.31.7(0.8)- 0.4 0.6
Debt financing
liabilities
(1.4) (1.3) - - - -
Inflation-sensitive
assets
Real estate10.97.06.96.95.74.2
Infrastructure 9.55.84.62.82.20.3
Inflation-linked
bonds
3.94.44.14.7 3.8 4.0
Investment
Portfolio
148.3127.7105.6122.8 116.6 98.0
* Includes non-investment assets such as premises and equipment and non-investment liabilities.
** Commencing in fiscal 2007, the rate of return reflects the performance of the investment portfolio, which excludes the Cash for Benefits portfolio.
*** The CPP Fund includes the non-marketable government bonds that predate the creation of the CPP Investment Board. We take these bonds into account when making investment decisions. Accordingly this financial highlights table for the CPP Fund includes the performance of these non-marketable government bonds.

So why is Mr. Campbell raising the issue at this time, I think it is to start to frame the agenda so the right wing agenda of Mr. Harper and his supporters can shift public thinking to the idea that we have to be prepared to have less services and less income.  (The following is taken from Why Stop Harper website)

Although seniors’ incomes have dropped for the first time in decades, it is clear the Harper government is laying the groundwork to replace Canada’s well-run, cost-effective, and stable CPP with a private, more expensive pension scheme – the Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPPMallick: “When Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, the government of Alberta and insurance giant Sun Life all agree that a national privatized pension plan is a great idea for your retirement, be very afraid. Feel your fear and let your anger flower.”

According to Sun Life Financial, Canadians are much less optimistic about retirement – and the average Canadian expects to retire at age 68, three years later than reported a year ago. The confidence level of working Canadians slumped to a low 39 in 2011, from 50 in 2008 and 51 in 2009. At the end of 2009, Canadians still believed recovery from the recession would be quicker than they now believe, but unemployment remained relatively high.

When older workers stay on the job it affects the labour market, resulting in fewer job openings and increased competition for younger people. Canada’s youth jobless rate is 14.4 per cent.

In the 2011 federal budget, responding to demands by the NDP, the government offered low-income seniors an extra $300 million annual enhancement to the Guaranteed Income Supplement. The NDP had requested $700 million.

The government ignored the NDP’s request for a doubling of CPP benefits.

Harper’s Income Trust “betrayal.” In 2005, Harper wrote: "Income trusts are popular with seniors because they provide regular payments that are used by many to cover the costs of groceries, heating bills and medicine." Then, without notice or consultation, he terminated them.

 So to move along the agenda to reduce and attack Senior benefits, the right needs spokespeople on Radio, and TV (corus radio and sun tv) to start to frame the agenda on pension and health care so that over the next few years the public will start to believe the big lie (remember the right has learned from the past, while the left still believes in an honest approach) and the frame will shift.  Don't forget that Steven Harper still has his agenda and will take steps to carry it out, he is a very patient and evil man.
 
 Remember that Steven Harper helped found and was 
president of the National Citizens Coalition, founded in 1967 to oppose Medicare, he supported US-style bank de-regulation. In his first budget, Finance Minister Flaherty invited “new players” into the Canadian mortgage market, offering greater choice and “innovation,” thus lowering mortgage insurance standards – the US recipe for disaster. Nevertheless, since the 2008 Financial Crisis, Harper has been taking credit for the relative strength of our financial sector, based on a system he inherited, but didn’t support.

Harper wants the federal government to abandon certain financial and administrative responsibilities – returning to an era 50 years ago before our nation-building social programs. Instead, his government “will look to innovative charities and forward-thinking private-sector companies to partner on new approaches to many social challenges.” Victorian England?

Harper thinks Medicare is provincial and wants to break it up. While heading the National Citizens Coalition, Harper said “the feds” should scrap the Canada Health Act. He doesn’t dare repeat that now, but he rules as though the law guaranteeing Canadians universality, portability, accessibility, and more doesn’t exist. Measures to encourage the provinces to comply with the Act aren't being enforced.