google.com, pub-7178919035426667, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Showing posts with label mis information false news fake news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mis information false news fake news. Show all posts

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Up date: Get the Facts Straight: Why Fake News Still Resonates with Seniors

 Over the past five days, more than 500 people have read this blog post  “Get the facts straight”. I wrote that post in 2013. It is still getting traction. That tells me something important: the anger and frustration that fuelled that old email are still very much alive. It also tells me that people are looking for answers to help solve their underlying anger and frustration.

I first wrote about the infamous "Jeff Smith" email that has been circulating on the Internet since 2011. You have probably seen it. It is a furious letter supposedly written by a Canadian senior named "Patty Johnstone" to a Quebec Senator named "Jeff Smith," accusing politicians of raiding the CPP, moving the goalposts on retirement, and calling seniors the "greediest generation."

The problem is that none of these people exist.

There is no Canadian Senator named Jeff Smith. There is no Patty Johnstone in Ontario who has admitted to writing this. The American version, attributed to "Patty Myers" in Montana, is equally fictional. The original angry letter surfaced in early 2011 but was initially anonymous. By late 2012, it began being attributed to Patty Myers, but TruthOrFiction.com has never confirmed the real author. The comments attributed to Senator Simpson that sparked the letter? They were made in response to the Simpson-Bowles proposal in the US, and the senator in question was actually a former US Senator from Wyoming, not a Canadian politician. The entire thing is a mix of half-truths, misattributions, and outright fabrication.

But here is the part that is not fake: the anger is real.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the US presidency. In 2018, Doug Ford won in Ontario. Both men understood and channelled the kind of anger expressed in that fake email, anger at a political establishment that seemed out of touch, anger at a system that felt rigged, anger at the sense that hard-working people were being left behind.

That anger did not disappear in 2026. If anything, it has grown.

Today, the average retirement age in Canada is 65.4 years, the highest it has been since the 1970s . More Canadians are working longer because they have to, not because they choose to. The Canada Pension Plan is still strong, but the cost of living has risen faster than benefits. OAS and GIS provide a safety net, but for many seniors, particularly women, it is not enough.

The recent National Institute on Ageing survey found that nearly a quarter of women over 50 said their income was inadequate. Two‑thirds of those women said cost was a barrier to social participation. More than half said they had negative perceptions of aging. These are not fake statistics. These are real people, real struggles, real frustration .

The fake email channels that frustration. It gives voice to a feeling that many seniors share: "I paid into the system. I did my part. Why am I still struggling?"

Here is what the fake email gets wrong:

1.  The CPP is not a Ponzi scheme. It is a well‑managed, funded plan with a robust investment portfolio. Unlike Social Security in the US, Canada's CPP was not "raided" by politicians. It has been managed independently and is projected to be sustainable for decades.

2.  The government did not "steal" your CPP contributions. They were never sitting in a personal account waiting for you. The CPP is a pay‑as‑you‑go system, meaning contributions from current workers fund current retirees. That is how it was designed from the start.

3.  No Canadian politician called seniors the "greediest generation." That comment was made in the US context, and even there, it was attributed to a specific proposal, not a blanket statement about all seniors.

4.  The retirement age did not change from 65 to 67 for most Canadians. There were discussions, but the age for OAS and GIS eligibility remains 65. The Canada Pension Plan can be taken as early as 60 (with a reduction) or as late as 70 (with an increase).

Why Does This Still Matter in 2026? Because fake stories can have real consequences.

When people share an angry, inaccurate email, they spread misinformation. They reinforce anger and distrust. They make it harder for people to separate fact from fiction.

But more importantly, they distract from the real issues. The fake email focuses on a fictional senator and a fabricated story. The real issues are:

·    The rising cost of living that squeezes fixed incomes

·    The lack of affordable housing for seniors

·    The shortage of home care and long‑term care spaces

·    The isolation and loneliness that affect so many seniors, especially women

·    The difficulty of navigating a complex retirement income system

These are the problems that deserve our attention. Not a fake email from 2011.

My Advice: Don't Pass It On. Get the Facts Straight.

I have been writing about seniors' issues for over two decades. I have seen this email circulate again and again. Every time it comes around, someone asks me if it is real. It is not.

If you receive it, do not forward it. Instead, fact‑check it. The most detailed fact‑checking on this email was done by TruthOrFiction.com, which traced the origins and confirmed that the letter was anonymous and misattributed. The characters are fictional, but the anger they vent is not. That is why it still gets shared, not because people believe every word, but because they feel the frustration behind it.

If you are angry about the real issues facing seniors, channel that energy into something productive:

1.  Check your CPP and OAS statements to understand to what you are entitled.

2.  Contact your MP about issues that matter to you.

3.  Get involved with local senior organizations like the Wilson Centre.

4.  Share accurate information with your friends and family.

That is how you make a difference. Not by forwarding a fake email. By getting the facts straight and acting on them.

If a story makes you angry, that is a signal. It means something matters to you. But anger is different from truth. Take a moment to verify what you are reading before you share it. Your friends, your family, and your community deserve better than misinformation, even when the sentiment behind it is real.

Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Do you fact check?

I like some of the emails and news clippings my friends send me, but I am careful about resending them. In Canada, the Criminal code states in section 372 subsections 1, 2, and 3 that 

(1) Everyone commits an offence who, with intent to injure or alarm a person, conveys information that they know is false or causes such information to be conveyed by letter or any means of telecommunication.

(2) Everyone commits an offence who, with intent to alarm or annoy a person, makes an indecent communication to that person or to any other person by a means of telecommunication.

(3) Everyone commits an offence who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass a person, repeatedly communicates, or causes repeated communications to be made, with them by a means of telecommunication.

(4) Everyone who commits an offence under this section is

(a) guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or

(b) guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

So if you receive info via email, Facebook, Instagram or Twitter and you want to pass it on, be aware of the laws of your country and also Fact Check the information. Here are a few places to help you start

The Reporters' Lab is a center for journalism research in the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. Our core projects focus on fact-checking, ...

List of fact-checking websites from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia lists fact checking sites from many countries around the world.

A fascinating resource is Medawise. This non-partisan outfit offers free tutorials on how to spot fake news from any source and make yourself a more discerning consumer of information. It has a separate Teen Network for helping young people navigate the dangerous waters of social media. something a grandchild or a parent might find helpful. There are sections designed especially for seniors. It is worth taking a look.


An approach I find helpful to separate the real from the fanciful is to read from several sources on each side of the major political divide. Look for key giveaways like "alleged," "one source reports, "unconfirmed information." Each of these gives me a clue that the story or piece of a story is potentially speculative or unproven. Those trigger phrases prompt me to check more sources to see who else may have more details. 


If I can't verify what I have read, I do not resend it, repost it, or use it as the basis for a snarky putdown on Facebook. I am not saying this statement is untrue, I am simply refusing to further its spread until I am convinced of its veracity.


If the poll numbers I quoted at the beginning of this post are accurate (and I did check that this story was not from just one source), then the bulk of us understand the harm misinformation can cause. As individuals, what we can do is not be part of the problem by spreading, amplifying, or keeping alive something that can hurt people.