There is no doubt that while the need for and benefits of
social connections and inclusion is clear for seniors, there are
considerations in providing services to this group. A literature review that was
part of a study on seniors and the impacts of leisure activity12 highlighted
the following challenges:
·
Connecting to services
·
Perception of barriers to participation e.g.,
clothing, funding
·
Factors that contribute to social isolation such
as loss, poor physical health, low morale,
·
being a caregiver, geographic isolation, and
transportation difficulties are often beyond the
·
socially isolated person's control and therefore
not obviously susceptible to improvement. Thus
·
designing effective interventions to address the
problem may be difficult.
There have been numerous interventions implemented
worldwide, but few systematic reviews have been done to assess the
effectiveness of these interventions in addressing social isolation in seniors.
In fact, research evidence to support the belief that intervention can
counteract social isolation and its adverse effects on older people is almost
non-existent. While research confirming the effectiveness of interventions is
not easily available – what is clear are the positive benefits of social
inclusion. Evidence consistently supports the idea that out of home activity
levels affect health status, well-being and survival in old age. “Disengagement
from out of home activities is associated with declines in cognitive
functioning among elderly persons"
The core principles of the Canadian National Framework on
Aging, developed through an extensive consultation with seniors and other
stakeholders, provide a solid foundation on which to build programs:
·
Dignity: being treated with respect, regardless
of the situation and having a sense of self esteem
·
Independence: being in control of one's life,
being able to do as much as possible and making one's own choice
·
Participation: getting involved, staying active
and taking part n the community, being consulted and having one's views
considered by Government
·
Fairness: having seniors real needs in all their
diversity, considered equally those of other Canadians
·
Security: having adequate income as one ages and
having access to a sage and supportive living environment
A study done in 1998 identified the following
characteristics of effective interventions:
·
Participation in group activities
·
Targeting common groups e.g., women, the
widowed, retired firefighters,
·
Using more than one method of intervention and
those that are effective across a broad range of
·
outcomes
·
Allowing participants some level of control
·
Ensuring the evaluation fits the intervention
and includes a process evaluation
The effectiveness of various interventions with isolated
seniors. These included one-on-one intervention, telephone support, gatekeeper
programs, group interventions of teleconferencing, support provision, Internet
groups, and support groups. While there was not enough commonality in the types
of interventions to consider the results conclusive, the authors felt the
results could provide guidelines for Future Development. They confirmed that it
is very important to:
·
Have high-quality approaches to the selection,
training and support of the facilitator or
·
coordinators of the intervention
·
Involve older people in the planning
implementation and evaluation stages
·
Use existing community resources and build
capacity
·
Evaluate and disseminate the research
It is difficult to quantify the exact number of isolated
seniors in a community however in a survey of the empirical literature
published between 1948 and 1991it was found that between 2 and 20 percent of
people over the age of 65 were socially isolated.
In Halton, the ESAC Quality of Life Report for Seniors in
Halton used national data to identify those levels of social support decline
with age, and up to 8% of seniors have no close relatives and 14% no close
friends putting them at risk of becoming isolated.